Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-27 Thread Tais M. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 November 2003 05:57, Patrick Cantwell wrote: Just for the record, I'm using a slackware 9.0 and a slackware 9.1 box with asterisk, and I had no problems obtaining, building/compiling, or running asterisk with a fresh install. I'll

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-27 Thread Lubomir Christov
slack here too - * is working STABLE Lubo Tais M. Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 November 2003 05:57, Patrick Cantwell wrote: Just for the record, I'm using a slackware 9.0 and a slackware 9.1 box with asterisk, and I had no problems obtaining,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-27 Thread Mark Spencer
Assuming you haven't cvs updated yet I can look at this problem but I need matching sources/binaries/cores. If you've cvs updated, there isn't much I can do. Mark On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Tais M. Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 November 2003 05:57,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-26 Thread Clif Jones
Thanks for the truly useful feedback. I'm having a real hard time with the FAQ pages listing RH 8 9 FIRST in the list of Linux distros that Asterisk compiles and runs on and having any bugs (oh I mean RH problems) discarded. It would be much more help to have responses such as yours or to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-26 Thread PJ Welsh
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:55:36PM -0500, Clif Jones wrote: Thanks for the truly useful feedback. I'm having a real hard time with the FAQ pages listing RH 8 9 FIRST in the list of Linux distros that Asterisk compiles and runs on and having any bugs (oh I mean RH problems) discarded. It

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-26 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 12:55, Clif Jones wrote: Thanks for the truly useful feedback. I'm having a real hard time with the FAQ pages listing RH 8 9 FIRST in the list of Linux distros that Asterisk compiles and runs on and having any bugs (oh I mean RH problems) discarded. It would be much

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-26 Thread Clif Jones
Thanks for the quick feedback! I don't have a lot of free time to play with Asterisk right now but a friend of mine wanted me to get it working on Red Hat for him which resulted in the RH problems/questions. Personally, I prefer Debian which suites my needs for embedded projects and hacked up

[Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-25 Thread Clif Jones
I have finally crashed Asterisk for the first time and I'm wondering if anyone has seen this. This is a configuration with SIP endpoints and an IAX2 channel to another Asterisk PBX. The main PBX dropped a core file after a SEGV (signal 11 ) with the following trace: #0 0x42079133 in strchr ()

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-25 Thread Clif Jones
Also I have found that safe_asterisk needs to have something like sleep 5 following the echo Restarting Asterisk If not, asterisk will immediately exit with return code 1 after restarting. Clif Jones wrote: I have finally crashed Asterisk for the first time and I'm wondering if anyone

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-25 Thread Brian West
Stop using RH9 since its majorly broken and that wont happen bkw On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Clif Jones wrote: Also I have found that safe_asterisk needs to have something like sleep 5 following the echo Restarting Asterisk If not, asterisk will immediately exit with return code 1 after

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-25 Thread Rich Adamson
Brian, Since not all of us are so enlightened, please complete the sentence so that at least some of us have a clue as to the non-partisan issues? No offense intended, but there really are folks here that would like to learn from other's experience however boring that might be.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Crashed Asterisk

2003-11-25 Thread duncan
Stop using RH9 since its majorly broken and that wont happen Since not all of us are so enlightened, please complete the sentence so that at least some of us have a clue as to the non-partisan issues? No offense intended, but there really are folks here that would like