Going to AMP, Setup - General - Extension of fax machine for receiving
faxes = disabled *should* disable fax detection by causing it to use a
different branch of the AMP macro's...
I did set it to disabled, but it still called NVFaxDetect() with a
parameter of zero.
I have a TDM400P with 2 FXO cards and I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.8
I noticed that when I place a call to the analog lines from outside,
Asterisk takes a while to actually ring the extension the call is
being sen to.
I've been doing some tests, calling from my cellphone and here is what I
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 02:28:51PM -0500, Derek Lee-Wo wrote:
I have a TDM400P with 2 FXO cards and I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.8
I noticed that when I place a call to the analog lines from outside,
Asterisk takes a while to actually ring the extension the call is
being sen to.
X100P and
- After the first ring on my cell, Asterisk logs to the CLI that is
has an incoming call
- After the second ring, it kicks off part of the incoming call context
I fixed this by setting:
usecallerid=no
in zapata.conf
I made this change and it helped in that it reduced the number of
rings.
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:28:15PM -0500, Derek Lee-Wo wrote:
I wonder if the NvFaxDetect() call is causing the extra delay. I
That sounds reasonable. * is answering the call, generating a ring back to the
caller, and listening
for fax noises before ringing your SIP device.
I have simply:
do... In any case, removing the fax detect seems like it should help.
I commented out the line and it works great. Two concerns though:
- I edited the extensions_additional.conf file, but my fear s that it
will get overwritten if I make further changes via AMP or upgrade. Is
there a way to
Derek Lee-Wo schreef:
do... In any case, removing the fax detect seems like it should help.
I commented out the line and it works great. Two concerns though:
- I edited the extensions_additional.conf file, but my fear s that it
will get overwritten if I make further changes via AMP or
