Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
But this doesn't work! As soon as we pass a number into the context, it matches successfully against _., and we get our sorry-no-match recording and the line hangs up. Here's how we force the ordering by using include to regulate order of matching: Thanks John, that's a great explanation!

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-16 Thread Mark Spencer
If I am dialing with a Bt101 or something that sends all the digits in a single packet, it works great. It fails miserably, however, if I'm dialing from a phone on an FXS port, or if I'm trying to do this on an answered call. Zap devices should handle this fine (maybe even MGCP), but SIP

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
Zap devices should handle this fine (maybe even MGCP), but SIP should fail with that sort of a configuration since we cannot differentiate between Number valid, but more could be useful and Number incomplete, therefore once we reach a match, we have to take it. I can't get anything to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-14 Thread John Todd
I have an interesting dilemma with sequencing in the dialplan. Up to now, I have assumed that the extensions in the dial plan were tested in the order that they appear in extensions.conf. In other words, I have the following fragment which was designed to dial toll free on the PSTN and all

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-14 Thread Stephen R. Besch
John Todd wrote: I have an interesting dilemma with sequencing in the dialplan. Up to now, I have assumed that the extensions in the dial plan were tested in the order that they appear in extensions.conf. In other words, I have the following fragment which was designed to dial toll free on

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-14 Thread Olle E. Johansson
This is such a wonderfully clear explanation of the asterisk sequencing methodology that I would suggest including it in the documentation as an example for using include in contexts. Stephen Besch Agreed. Added to http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+config+extensions.conf

[Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-12 Thread Stephen R. Besch
I have an interesting dilemma with sequencing in the dialplan. Up to now, I have assumed that the extensions in the dial plan were tested in the order that they appear in extensions.conf. In other words, I have the following fragment which was designed to dial toll free on the PSTN and all

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-12 Thread David Gomillion
-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing I have an interesting dilemma with sequencing in the dialplan. Up to now, I have assumed that the extensions in the dial plan were tested in the order that they appear in extensions.conf. In other words, I have the following fragment which was designed to dial toll

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-12 Thread Stephen R. Besch
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing I have an interesting dilemma with sequencing in the dialplan. Up to now, I have assumed that the extensions in the dial plan were tested in the order that they appear in extensions.conf. In other words, I have the following fragment which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-12 Thread Carlton J. O'Riley
Here is what I have which uses IAXTEL for 800 calling and VOIP for long distance with a fall back to my PSTN line. I don't have any issues as far as 1800 numbers being grabbed before the long distance numbers. My internal context is for all extensions inside the house, whereas the fax doesn't

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Plan Sequencing

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew Thompson
That is just beautiful... Would you mind if it got into the wiki, or onto a webpage here or there? - Andrew Thompson - Original Message - From: Carlton J. O'Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:48 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial