- Original Message -
From: Chris Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
- Original Message -
From: Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
for ill, would probably use direct
ip-dialing anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Florin Andrei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=158tid=95tid=103
Probably some of you already saw this.
Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling
(whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it),
there's the technical aspect.
Suppose i
- Original Message -
From: Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=158tid=95tid=1
03
Probably some of you already
.
-Original Message-
From: Florin Andrei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=15
8tid=95tid=103
Probably some of you
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=158tid=95
tid=1 03 Probably some of you already saw this. Now, beyond
discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether they
have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's the
technical aspect.
Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=158tid=95tid=1
03
Probably some of you already saw this.
Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether
they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's
Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251tid=15
8tid=95tid=103
Probably some of you already saw this.
Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a
ruling (whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right
to enforce it), there's the technical
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
AFAIK, these records (Nice, Witness) only work on a LAN (through passive
sniffing on a hub or using a span port) or through a conference server.
Either way, it'll require the RTP to be proxied through the provider. In
reality
Me raises his hand.
All in favor of IAX with native encrypted tunneling say Aye :-)
Now I'm likely in the target rings of Big Brother :-)
If the voice data passed through a service provider run asterisk
system, I'd imagine they'd just get a court order to force IAX
encryption to be turned
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
Me raises his hand.
All in favor of IAX with native encrypted tunneling say
Aye
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Me raises his hand.
All in favor of IAX with native encrypted tunneling say Aye :-)
Now I'm likely in the target rings of Big Brother :-)
If the voice data passed through a service provider run asterisk
system, I'd imagine they'd just get a court order to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Blakely) writes:
Does the FCC honestly expect that criminals are going to stop using
encrypted point-to-point VOIP connections just so that they won't be
breaking the law?
Yeah, right. I'm sure they'll all erase their encrypted IM clients so
that the FCC will be
13 matches
Mail list logo
