On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:20:43AM +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8 Feb 2006, at 09:43, JP Carballo wrote:
Alex Barnes wrote:
I think the once it's working, leave it alone advice is very sound
indeed :)
A similar rule says If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Until you realize some
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:38:33AM -0500, Technical Support wrote:
I think that some people try to make their asterisk box a do-everything
super server. Can you image a traditional PBX with direct access via the
internet, serving web pages via apache, running sendmail, etc.
Our approach has
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:03:51PM -0500, Paul wrote:
Ryan Amos wrote:
This is turning into a sysadmin theory flamewar, but I think the main
point is that Fedora probably isn't the best thing to run on production
machines for QA reasons. This is because Fedora is more or less the QA
testbed
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:58 -0500, Matt Roth wrote:
Keep in mind that if you want to run Asterisk Business Edition, RedHat
Enterprise 3 or Fedora Core 3 are currently required in order to receive
full technical support. My options were narrowed down further by the
amount of RAM in our
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:12:44AM +, Pete Barnwell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:58 -0500, Matt Roth wrote:
Keep in mind that if you want to run Asterisk Business Edition, RedHat
Enterprise 3 or Fedora Core 3 are currently required in order to receive
full technical support. My
However, if you expose the box to the internet, you might want to upgrade
those components that are known to have vulnerabilities. If you don't, count
on the box being compromised sooner or later.
This is sound advice worth taking. If you get a system stable in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: 08 February 2006 08:41
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum
update
ornot
Alex Barnes wrote:
I think the once it's working, leave it alone advice is very sound
indeed :)
A similar rule says If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
--
JP Carballo
http://www.netfone2x.com
Bringing the world closer.
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level, I'm
On 8 Feb 2006, at 09:43, JP Carballo wrote:
Alex Barnes wrote:
I think the once it's working, leave it alone advice is very sound
indeed :)
A similar rule says If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Until you realize some script kiddie has exploited another Apache/
mod_ssl bug and is now
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8 Feb 2006, at 09:43, JP Carballo wrote:
Alex Barnes wrote:
I think the once it's working, leave it alone advice is very sound
indeed :)
A similar rule says If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Until you realize some script kiddie has exploited another Apache/
Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: 08 February 2006 08:41
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:04 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: 08 February 2006 08:41
To: Asterisk
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
On 2/8/06, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe some people think that a PBX should come with a few games just
like so many cell phones these days
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Vagelpohl
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
On 8 Feb 2006, at 09:43, JP
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Price
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
ornot?
Zach A wrote:
What is recommended
Keep in mind that if you want to run Asterisk Business Edition, RedHat
Enterprise 3 or Fedora Core 3 are currently required in order to receive
full technical support. My options were narrowed down further by the
amount of RAM in our production server. It has 20GBs, and all of the
Ryan Amos wrote:
This is turning into a sysadmin theory flamewar, but I think the main
point is that Fedora probably isn't the best thing to run on production
machines for QA reasons. This is because Fedora is more or less the QA
testbed for RHEL. CentOS is, for all intents and purposes (except a
Hi everyone,
What is recommended for a production quality system, FC3 or FC4. Once
installed, is it necessary to run yum update, does that make things any
better or just take up more memory?
Zach A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
] On Behalf Of Zach A
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update or not?
Hi everyone,
What is recommended for a production quality system, FC3 or FC4. Once
installed
] On Behalf Of Zach A
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update or not?
Hi everyone,
What is recommended for a production quality system, FC3 or FC4. Once
installed
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update
or not?
This is sound advice worth taking. If you get a system stable in
production, LEAVE IT ALONE
] On Behalf Of Damon
EstepSent: 26 August 2005 17:46To: Asterisk Users Mailing
List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] fedora
core 3 kernel source - couldsomeonethrowthe dog a bone!
What was the issue with
zaptel and 2.6.12?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ok, dont flame me, I know this is a question with an
obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my
ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update
Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12
Installed the SRPM package
Ran
This could be a duplicate post, sent it originally 4 hours
ago, it never showed up!
I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some,
but I am not one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my
ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update
Downloaded the
What was the issue with zaptel and 2.6.12?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Archer
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005
1:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
fedora core 3 kernel source
: [Asterisk-Users] fedora core
3 kernel source - could someone throwthe dog a bone!
This could be a duplicate post, sent
it originally 4 hours ago, it never showed up!
I know this is a question with an
obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I
decide
Permission denied when using asterisk startup
scripts or safe_asterisk
Both the asterisk script in /etc/init.d and the
safe_asterisk script in /usr/sbin are marked as executable text files, but both
result in permission denied when I try to execute them or when called at
startup.
Can
I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not
one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit
old, so typical yum update
Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12...
Installed the SRPM package
Ran rpmbuild -bp -target=i686
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 23:56 +0200, Harald Holzer wrote:
The OP said
I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not
one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit
old, so typical yum update
Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my
] fedora core 3 kernel source - could
someone
throw the dog a bone!
I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am
not
one of them.
Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a
bit
old, so typical yum update
Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 08:14 +1000, Eric Bishop wrote:
Yes, I have some advice. Use Fedora Core 2. I have battaled for almost
a year to get fcpci and udev-based distributions working with very
limited success.
On 7/21/05, Adrià Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone have info about
Well,
I tried it with ALL the distributions you mentioned, especially CentOS
4.1 and could not get past various issues like kernel panics etc. when
loading the fcpci driver. Can you give us some tips on how you set it
up?
On 7/21/05, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 08:14
Someone have info about install an AVM fritz into FC3 ?
I'm getting problems with kernelcapi, after succesfully installed the
fcpci support.
Thanks
--
Adrià Vidal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail is better with 1Gmail
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Yes, I have some advice. Use Fedora Core 2. I have battaled for almost
a year to get fcpci and udev-based distributions working with very
limited success.
On 7/21/05, Adrià Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone have info about install an AVM fritz into FC3 ?
I'm getting problems with
Dear asterisk-users,
Allow me to preface this newbie's question with a statement:
1. I searched the archives the Wiki
2. I Googled until I couldn't Google anymore
My questions concern the installation of the latest/greatest Asterisk
on Fedora Core 3 with a Shorewall (Shoreline)
El lun, 02-05-2005 a las 16:14, Anonymous Account escribió:
My questions concern the installation of the latest/greatest Asterisk
on Fedora Core 3 with a Shorewall (Shoreline) Firewall installed.
For me * works fine, with FC3 and iptables (Shorewall is an IPtables
too)
I haven't been able to
Not sure about FC3 issues, but I use Shorewall on the border. My *
server is a 1-1 NAT inside. Here's all I need in /etc/shorewall/rules:
# for SIP, IAX2, IAX, RTP, MGCP
ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.5 udp 5060,4569,5036,1:2,2727 - -
- -
I probably don't need all that, since I'm not
Is there any reason to avoid * on Fedora Core 3 at this time?
Have most/all of the issues been resolved now?
Rich
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Rich Adamson wrote:
Is there any reason to avoid * on Fedora Core 3 at this time?
Have most/all of the issues been resolved now?
Rich,
Both my Asterisk servers run FC3. The only issue I ran into was the
change in RPMs for the source. FC doesn't distribute the
kernel-source RPM any more.
I use FC3 on all our servers including 3 * servers.
I have absolutely no issues what so ever.
You do NOT need the kernel source RPM (which I don't even think exists
anymore) as they've changed how they set up the kernel RPMs somewhere
after FC1.
The source rpm from FC1 (which is a bit old
j wrote:
I use FC3 on all our servers including 3 * servers.
Great news.
The regular kernel rpms now come with all the headers and development
stuff included.
You should be able to install the kernel rpm and compile zaptel right
away.
do an rpm -ql kernel | less to check out the contents.
Is there any reason to avoid * on Fedora Core 3 at this time?
Have most/all of the issues been resolved now?
I don't know about the issues on FC3, but I wouldn't want to use a
testing distro on a production server.
If you are looking for a stable distro that cost nothing, have a look
at CentOS
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3?
I use FC3 on all our servers including 3 * servers.
I have absolutely no issues what so ever.
You do NOT need the kernel source RPM (which I don't even think exists
anymore) as they've
Race Vanderdecken wrote:
I am running on an Intel Pentium 3, 1.5 GHz, mother board stuck inside
an old E-machine case and it is very happy... (I only wish I could find
a Okidata B4250 printer driver or a PCL-6 I could understand.)
Just as an FYI I have a configuration suppestion to pass along...
If you have:
Fedora Core 3
Asterisk 1.0.x
Digium Wildcard T100P PCI Card
In order to get the card to work you MUST edit
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules
Goto the end of the file and
Ty Carter wrote:
Just as an FYI I have a configuration suppestion to pass along...
If you have:
Fedora Core 3
Asterisk 1.0.x
Digium Wildcard T100P PCI Card
In order to get the card to work you MUST edit
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules
Goto the end of the file
-Users] Fedora Core 3 app_curl compile error?
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else run into this problem? I can chase down
Michael Swan wrote:
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else run into this problem? I
At 03:55 PM 12/29/2004 +1300, you wrote:
Michael Swan wrote:
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anybody managed
to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with the TDM400P
cards?
Everything is going
fine untilI do
modprobe
mcfxs
Any ideas?
It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.
Graeme
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with
the TDM400P
cards?
Everything is going fine until I do
modprobe mcfxs
Any ideas? It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.
The driver for the TDM400P card is wctdm. Not sure what a mcfxs happens
to be.
--Original Message Text---
From: Graeme Ogilvie
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:45:41 -
Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with
the TDM400P cards?
Everything is going fine until I do
modprobe mcfxs
Any ideas? It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards?
Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers
working with the TDM400P
cards?
Everything is going fine until I do
modprobe mcfxs
Any ideas? It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.
The driver
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:00 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working
with the TDM400P
cards?
Everything is going fine until I do
modprobe mcfxs
Any ideas? It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.
The driver for
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 15:17 -0600, Mitchell S. Sharp wrote:
[ content removed]
I hadn't run into this problem on FC1 or FC2, but this was the first
time I've tried running * on a Linux 2.6 kernel. I have a single
TDM400P with 3 FXS modules. I use the init script found
in
Works great, thanks Mitch!
Much appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell S. Sharp
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards
Ok I've just joined and attempted to search the archives but have not found
anything...
Is Fedora Core 3 Supported?
Directions for Fedora core 3 install if available would be nice. If not I'll
be attempting it anyway and can start a crude set. Assuming that they do not
does anybody have a
Assuming that they do not does anybody have a set for Fedora core 2?
Unfortunately I don't have the Hardware to go with it just playing and
testing the server and yes I'm using it on FC2. It compiled fine and
was able to connect to the testing server useing CLI.
--
Mike Ramirez [EMAIL
Fred Skrotzki wrote:
Is Fedora Core 3 Supported?
Fred,
I've just installed FC3 on a new box and will be installing Asterisk
today. I've done it a couple times and had no problems with the compile
and install. Just starting to learn *. I haven't gone beyond the
compile/install and play
Sir,
I am using FC3 with no problem. I have the T1 card.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 supported?
| Sir,
|
| I am using FC3 with no problem. I have the T1 card.
|
Has Core 3 been made to behave like Core 1
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:01 -0500, Cirelle Enterprises wrote:
Has Core 3 been made to behave like Core 1 with
respect to the zaptel drivers?
FC3 is different in that it uses udev. Google, #fedora on freenode.net
and the fedora list are your sources of info should you want to learn
more about
Has Core 3 been made to behave like Core 1 with
respect to the zaptel drivers?
FC3 is different in that it uses udev. Google, #fedora on freenode.net
and the fedora list are your sources of info should you want to learn
more about udev.
Here's my notes on getting the Zaptel stuff working on
9. When the hardware checker finds a new Tiger Jet device, just
ignore it. (Anyone know how to make it stop bothering me?)
Choose Do nothing and it should stop bothering you.. thanks for the
install tops I may be having a go with FC3 in the near future..
66 matches
Mail list logo
