> Have you experienced a hardware failure yet that you had to come back
> from? If you loose a drive, it is a high probability that you will loose
> the controller. So unless you have a add on card, or some motherboard
Yes, many times. I have _never_ lost a controller when the drive went; the
dr
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:55, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> At 1/16/04 7:25 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >That's pure bullshit -- I use software RAID *specifically* because I value
> >my data. I don't want to buy two hardaware RAID controllers to have one
> >sit on the shel
On Friday, 16 January, 2004 12:27, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 06:47, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > > If you value your data, don't use software raid. If you value
> > > performance don't use software raid. If you value uptime/stability
> > > don't use any raid on IDE.
> >
> > T
On Saturday 17 January 2004 00:31, Chris Albertson wrote:
> Software RAID vs. Hardward RAID???
Welcome to the 80s.
> There IS no "Hardward RAID" it's all "software" the difference is
> only where the software lives, in ROM on the controler card in
> the RAID box or in a Linux driver.
Actually, h
Software RAID vs. Hardward RAID???
There IS no "Hardward RAID" it's all "software" the difference is
only where the software lives, in ROM on the controler card in
the RAID box or in a Linux driver.
If you go top of the line and buy a Netapp network attached storage
box. It thin it is just BSD
Robert L Mathews wrote:
At 1/16/04 7:25 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
That's pure bullshit -- I use software RAID *specifically* because I value
my data. I don't want to buy two hardaware RAID controllers to have one
sit on the shelf just in case the first dies... and if the
At 1/16/04 7:25 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>That's pure bullshit -- I use software RAID *specifically* because I value
>my data. I don't want to buy two hardaware RAID controllers to have one
>sit on the shelf just in case the first dies... and if the second dies
>you're
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 06:47, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > If you value your data, don't use software raid. If you value
> > performance don't use software raid. If you value uptime/stability don't
> > use any raid on IDE.
>
> That's pure bullshit -- I use software RAID *specifically* because I valu
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:47:34AM -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith said:
> I can also put some extra dimes into the power supply... or fans... or
> anything. Dell/Compaq/whoever does not mean high quality by default.
In fact, they generally used the CHEAPEST parts they can find to keep
costs down. Dell'
> If you value your data, don't use software raid. If you value
> performance don't use software raid. If you value uptime/stability don't
> use any raid on IDE.
That's pure bullshit -- I use software RAID *specifically* because I value
my data. I don't want to buy two hardaware RAID controllers
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 17:44, Chris Albertson wrote:
> --- calvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am real close to finalizing my hardware selection for my Asterisk
> > test
> > machine. I am going to use the following hardware:
> >
> > Dell 400SC w\Red Hat 9.0
> >
> > 1 - 4 Port TDM40
--- calvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am real close to finalizing my hardware selection for my Asterisk
> test
> machine. I am going to use the following hardware:
>
> Dell 400SC w\Red Hat 9.0
>
> 1 - 4 Port TDM40B Card (FXS)
> 3 - Wildcard X100P Cards (FXO)
It does not matter if th
I am real close to finalizing my hardware selection for my Asterisk test
machine. I am going to use the following hardware:
Dell 400SC w\Red Hat 9.0
1 - 4 Port TDM40B Card (FXS)
3 - Wildcard X100P Cards (FXO)
Are there any known conflicts using this setup in this machine? I will be
occupy
13 matches
Mail list logo
