But I've got a stack of flyers and promo sheets that say $ISA_CARD work
fine shareing IRQs! /troll heh.
Nick
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:24:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Stephen R. Besch wrote:
own card to determine if it is the interrupting hardware.
In
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
Shared IRQs are just bad. Just the PC hardware does not have enough IRQs
to handle all the devices we want to connect to them, nowadays.
No, that's not the reason at all. Most systems are not short of IRQs.
The reason is that standard PCI bus
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Stephen R. Besch wrote:
own card to determine if it is the interrupting hardware.
In point of fact, this same strategy was possible on the ISA bus, it
just wasn't used.
I dont think level-triggered interrupts ever reliably worked on ISA, it
was always edge. I never heard
No, that's not the reason at all. Most systems are not short of IRQs.
The reason is that standard PCI bus only has 4 interrupt lines.
Shared IRQs are not bad at all. It's only bad if the card is badly
designed.
All the Zaptel hardware *should* be able to share IRQ's. Each of the
cards has
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:
No, that's not the reason at all. Most systems are not short of IRQs.
The reason is that standard PCI bus only has 4 interrupt lines.
Shared IRQs are not bad at all. It's only bad if the card is badly
designed.
All the Zaptel hardware *should* be
