On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:11:02 +1100, Paul Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also - the mobile phone plans we are using get very expensive after approx
> 1500 minutes, so we have to make sure that none of the lines go over that!
>
> But the zap/r1 options should be OK for a start at least.
show
]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2004 10:34 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Line load balancing
> Paul, your current method of load balancing is quite fine. Why do
> you
want
> to round robin load balance?
Even call distrubution
> Paul, your current method of load balancing is quite fine. Why do you
want
> to round robin load balance?
Even call distrubution makes it easier to spot a bad line, esp. if it is one
of the last lines in the group.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[E
> We have 4 Telular mobile phone gateways hooked up to an Asterisk box, and
we
> need the Asterisk box to balance the load across the 4 lines. Currently,
> Asterisk uses the first line, and subsequent lines when the first is busy.
are these GW's using a zaptel interface if so
you could use the rou
Paul Hales wrote:
We have 4 Telular mobile phone gateways hooked up to an Asterisk box, and we
need the Asterisk box to balance the load across the 4 lines. Currently,
Asterisk uses the first line, and subsequent lines when the first is busy.
This means that our first line is in use almost 100%, an
rcial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Line load balancing
We have 4 Telular mobile phone gateways hooked up to an Asterisk box, and we
need the Asterisk box to balance the load across the 4 lines. Currently,
Asterisk uses the first line, and subsequent lines when the first is busy.
This
We have 4 Telular mobile phone gateways hooked up to an Asterisk box, and we
need the Asterisk box to balance the load across the 4 lines. Currently,
Asterisk uses the first line, and subsequent lines when the first is busy.
This means that our first line is in use almost 100%, and the last line
