John,
why don't you migrate slowly to asterisk ? If you want to keep
most of your analog phone hardware, leave it on your Meridian 1.
The M1 is doing a good job on features on analog phone sets.
Also, your users are familiar with the call handling of the
M1. Install VoIP phones on Asterisk and
--On Thursday, November 17, 2005 11:13 AM -0500 C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Use Channel Banks, they are the best possible. A quad port T1 gives
you 96 channels, all can be used for analog stations. which means you
will need at least 2 quad t1 cards. I personaly like the Adit 600 for
this
I disagree with PaulH on this one. Cheap IP phones makes for *cheap*
phone, cheap sound, and cheap features. The cheapest IP phone you can
get will come to around $60.00 USD, which multiplied by 150 makes
$9,000.00. While a channel bank (ADIT 600) with 6 FXS cards (48 ports)
runs around
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with PaulH on this one. Cheap IP phones makes for *cheap*
phone, cheap sound, and cheap features. The cheapest IP phone you can
get will come to around $60.00 USD, which multiplied by 150 makes
$9,000.00. While a channel
I work for a company that is nearing the end-of-life on its existing
Nortel Meridian switch and is considering Asterisk. We have
approximately 200 existing extensions, and probably 150 out of those 200
are using basic analog phones and would stay that way. The rest would
have VOIP phones at the
On 11/17/05, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work for a company that is nearing the end-of-life on its existing
Nortel Meridian switch and is considering Asterisk. We have
approximately 200 existing extensions, and probably 150 out of those 200
are using basic analog phones and would
- Original Message -
From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mission-Critical Deployments
I work for a company that is nearing the end-of-life on its existing
Nortel Meridian switch
On 11/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mission-Critical Deployments
I work for a company that is nearing
I disagree with PaulH on this one. Cheap IP phones makes for *cheap*
phone, cheap sound, and cheap features. The cheapest IP phone you can
get will come to around $60.00 USD, which multiplied by 150 makes
$9,000.00. While a channel bank (ADIT 600) with 6 FXS cards (48 ports)
runs around
On 11/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with PaulH on this one. Cheap IP phones makes for *cheap*
phone, cheap sound, and cheap features. The cheapest IP phone you can
get will come to around $60.00 USD, which multiplied by 150 makes
$9,000.00. While a channel
C F wrote:
This is exactly what I disagree with. The BT101's are not worth
*anything* even if you pay me to take them I will *never* install them
for a client. They need babysitting, rebooting, terrible sound
quality, and are very not userfriendly. Going the analog way (vs
BT101) is not close
Original Message -
From: Brian Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mission-Critical Deployments
C F wrote:
This is exactly what I
Hm..it's pretty close price wiseI thought the channel banks
would cost more...
With regards to functionality, I would have to test the two setups side
by
side.
I know that at a site we setup, the grandstream BT101's came out about
the
same as cheap analogs with regards to
We've got a couple dozen BT-101s deployed in an office environment. No
babysitting, no complaints from users, no rebooting. Their sound
quality isn't the same as a Cisco 7920, but neither is their price. . .
In other words, folks, YMMV.
I say it's worth a person's while to invest a
14 matches
Mail list logo
