Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-22 Thread Marco Mouta
Are you using which version of Asterisk?? Did you check if you are facing the old audio bug on bridge calls that appeared ? http://asteriskvoip.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_asteriskvoip_archive.html Wednesday, January 25, 2006 Update: No audio - Update your Asterisk This morning we discovered a serio

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-22 Thread Charles Marcus
C F wrote: Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT. Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect multiple offices? Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a NAT device, and the phones are only being used for norm

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Rich Adamson
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, C F wrote: Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT. Are you kidding me? I used to think that anything SIP was a pain behind NAT until I turned on 'nat=yes' for the peer/user/friend entry in sip.conf and told

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread C F
I didn't say it doens't work, I said it's not the best, and if you want I'll repeat myslef, Polycoms are not the best behind NAT, Cisco, or SPAs are much better. Just because you didn't run into any problems doesn't mean that it works well with all NAT devices. On 3/21/06, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, C F wrote: > Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT. Are you kidding me? I used to think that anything SIP was a pain behind NAT until I turned on 'nat=yes' for the peer/user/friend entry in sip.conf and told the IP501 to register to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread C F
Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT. On 3/21/06, Gabriel Afana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > Yes, canreinvite is set to no on all lines. > > After some testing, I was able to get sound between phones when they were > both registered to th

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Gabriel Afana
Thanks for the response. Yes, canreinvite is set to no on all lines. After some testing, I was able to get sound between phones when they were both registered to the same server. Maybe the IAX trunk is messing something up. strange because it was working perfect last week and nothing changed!

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-20 Thread Gabriel Afana
Afana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions > I just did a little RTP de