> Consider it backwards compatibility, sure, use [EMAIL PROTECTED] where you
> can, but I surely know if I told my parents to call me at ...
Right now my grandstream bt-100 and asterisk team up to deliver "6001"
as the number that I can be reached at to any remote caller. Somehow
I don't think t
--- Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> からのメッセージ：
> why enum?
My comment wasn't about ENUM at all.
I said: *some* universal directory facility, ie ENUM
you're welcome to replace ENUM with
The point was that the proliferation of VoIP in
combination with a
On 06:51 AM 7/7/2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>why enum? forcing humans to deal with telephone numbers
>is analogous to asking them to use ip addresses instead
>of domain names (which are bad enough, but that's another
>story). do you want to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>so why not 'dial' [EMAIL
> after i had spent a bunch of time working out and pushing
> the enum hack (shamelessly stolen from tpc.int), allison
> mankin hit me with a clue-by-four and asked what was the
> sense in mapping phone numbers into a name space that
> already worked and was sufficient. i felt pretty
> stoopid.
E
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At that point, virtually every business and every
> > household will have such a box. Couple that with some
> > universal directory facility, ie ENUM and you have got a
> > ubiquitous peer-to-peer telephone network where telcos
> > will have no role to play o
i buy most of what you say except
> At that point, virtually every business and every
> household will have such a box. Couple that with some
> universal directory facility, ie ENUM and you have got a
> ubiquitous peer-to-peer telephone network where telcos
> will have no role to play other than p
> Okay, setting aside conspiracy theories, trolling, flaming, etc, let me
> summarize some differences between SIP and IAX, and it might help you
> make a decision about what is best for you.
brilliant piece. thanks! damned shame i cound not find it on
google/wiki so i did not have to make so mu
