On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:08:13AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:03:20AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > > The reason why it is not working for you is, that mISDN i
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:14:16PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
>
> No, this is callingpartynumber and is not needed. We need calledpartynumber.
That was it. After Karsten sent me a new patch that sends the correct
INFO_IND, I'm now seeing the call in asterisk. IT'S WORKING! Thanks for
your suppo
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:03:20AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > The reason why it is not working for you is, that mISDN is not sending the
> > calledpartynumber IE as INFO_IND, which should be done in PtP mode.
> > Karsten already contacted me an
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:03:20AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> The reason why it is not working for you is, that mISDN is not sending the
> calledpartynumber IE as INFO_IND, which should be done in PtP mode.
> Karsten already contacted me and he said that this missing and needs to be
> added.
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:32:27PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:32:27PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > > Maybe chan_capi should have a timeout waiting for more
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:55:50PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> ...
> > - But I guess the workaround would yield to my current situation (I'm
> > running a patched version of 0.35 currently as mentioned at the start
> > of this tread): When a
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
...
> - But I guess the workaround would yield to my current situation (I'm
> running a patched version of 0.35 currently as mentioned at the start
> of this tread): When a caller uses overlap sending (e.g from a POTS
> line) instead of block dia
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > See above: Seems the dialplan match isn't detected??
> It will be detected when chan_capi gets the signal to check it
> (SENDING-COMPLETE/SETUP INFO_IND, or normal CONNECT_IND in MSN mode with
> immediate=yes).
Hmm. As already m
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:32:27PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > > Anyway, your config is set to DID mode. So chan_capi wi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:32:27PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > Anyway, your config is set to DID mode. So chan_capi will wait for more
> > > digits (an INFO_IND with called
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > Ah, I see. Not very nice to send such a confusing log ;-)
> I'm sorry.
>
> > Anyway, your config is set to DID mode. So chan_capi will wait for more
> > digits (an INFO_IND with c
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> Ah, I see. Not very nice to send such a confusing log ;-)
I'm sorry.
> Anyway, your config is set to DID mode. So chan_capi will wait for more
> digits (an INFO_IND with called-party-number) and if the already given
> destination
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:20:05AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > OK, I've reported a bug to mISDN. With the patch from the Karsten Keil
> > > in the mantis tracker:
> > > issue: https://www.isdn4linux.de/mantis/view.php?id=40
> > > I'm now gett
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:20:05AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > OK, I've reported a bug to mISDN. With the patch from the Karsten Keil
> > in the mantis tracker:
> > issue: https://www.isdn4linux.de/mantis/view.php?id=40
> > I'm now gettig connect_ind and info_ind in the correct order (asteris
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:31AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> >
> > > > > Interesting is, that I receive an INFO_IND *bef
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:31AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
>
> > > > Interesting is, that I receive an INFO_IND *before* the CONNECT_IND.
> > > > This looks like an interest
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:31AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > > Interesting is, that I receive an INFO_IND *before* the CONNECT_IND.
> > > > This looks like an interesting variation of Austrian ISDN to me.
> > >
> > > Maybe it is a variation of the ISDN line, but the driver should fix tha
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > > Hello Armin, hello List
> > > I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable
> > > (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2).
> > > I m
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
> > Hello Armin, hello List
> > I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable
> > (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2).
> > I managed to get it compiled by providing my own version of
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> Hello Armin, hello List
> I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable
> (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2).
> I managed to get it compiled by providing my own version of
> ast_copy_string.
Hmm, t
21 matches
Mail list logo
