I followed the instructions at http://www.opencall.org/instructions.html
and
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-October/025094.html
I was able to compile spandsp (./configure ; make ; make install),
manually patched asterisk apps/Makefile (/usr/src/asterisk/apps), as the
, June 19, 2004 10:14 PM
To: Asterisk Mailling List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Softfax/spandsp Makefile.patch rxfax/txfax
I followed the instructions at http://www.opencall.org/instructions.html
and
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-October/025094.html
I was able to compile
Steve, first thanks for the great work (especially the bugfixes).
As development on SoftFAX/spandsp is especially fast and from the
source it appears that you are using version control, it would be very
nice for us users and testers to have read access to a repository.
My cvs/subversion is
That would be great. Steve, please also consider using sourceforge.net to
host the project.
Alex.
- Original Message -
From: Jeb Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp cvs access
Steve, first
Alex Volkov wrote:
That would be great. Steve, please also consider using sourceforge.net to
host the project.
Alex.
OK, I considered it.
No.
Steve, first thanks for the great work (especially the bugfixes).
As development on SoftFAX/spandsp is especially fast and from the
source it appears
Hi Alex,
Alex Zarubin wrote:
Hi Steve and all,
1. Faxing from asterisk back to the same asterisk (from one Zap
channel to another)
doesn't work for us. Txfax called with the 'caller' parameter
issues CED, while the
receiving side needs CNG in order to switch to fax extension
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Alex,
Alex Zarubin wrote:
Hi Steve and all,
1. Faxing from asterisk back to the same asterisk (from one Zap
channel to another)
doesn't work for us. Txfax called with the 'caller' parameter
issues CED, while the
receiving side needs CNG in order to
Hi Alex,
Alex Zarubin wrote:
Hi Steve and all,
1. Faxing from asterisk back to the same asterisk (from one Zap
channel to another)
doesn't work for us. Txfax called with the 'caller' parameter
issues CED, while the
receiving side needs CNG in order to switch to fax extension
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp - txfax
Hi Steve and all,
1. Faxing from asterisk back to the same asterisk (from one Zap channel to another)
doesn't work for us. Txfax called with the 'caller' parameter issues CED, while the
receiving side needs CNG in order to switch to fax
Dear Steve
I installed the new version of spandsp 1i i used Mandrake 9.2 and upgrade my
libtiff with newer and also copy tiff header files as you write in README:
libtiff3-3.5.7-11mdk
libtiff-progs-3.5.7-11mdk
libtiff3-devel-3.5.7-11mdk
--
But when i send a Fax from my Canon B150 i have
I just built the latest * from CVS, spandsp 1i, and hacked app_rxfax
for the 'lock' parameters (I used 0 in all cases). The result of my
first fax transmission attempt is the following, which I post in case it
helps the developers any... The only thing I changed is the phone number
(TSI), which
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp - rxfax findings (spandsp-0.0.1i)
Hi,
One more step ahead, with:
- no problems receiving from the regular fax machines in the office,
- 3 attempts receiving from J2: 2 successes, 1 failure (page cutoff),
- 3 attempts receiving from Dialogic VFX
Hi Rob,
The modem training is not even close to correct. It looks like the FAX
software is not seeing good audio from the FAX machine. However, it
might be a strange problem in my modem software. The way to investigate
something like this is to look in spandsp-0.0.1/src/t30.c The first line
Hi all,
spandsp-0.0.1h.tar.gz seemed to get a lot more FAX machines talking, but
a number of people are getting rather high error rates on the images.
spandsp-0.0.1i.tar.gz addresses this, and should give much better bit
error rates for fax machines whose timing at the extremes the spec
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi all,
spandsp-0.0.1h.tar.gz seemed to get a lot more FAX machines talking,
but a number of people are getting rather high error rates on the
images. spandsp-0.0.1i.tar.gz addresses this, and should give much
better bit error rates for fax machines whose timing at the
Hi,
-Original Message-
spandsp-0.0.1h.tar.gz seemed to get a lot more FAX machines
talking, but a number of people are getting rather high error
rates on the images.
spandsp-0.0.1i.tar.gz addresses this, and should give much
better bit error rates for fax machines whose timing
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Florian Overkamp wrote:
gcc -O2 -g -Iinclude -I../include -c -o app_rxfax.o app_rxfax.c
In file included from /usr/local/include/spandsp.h:40,
from app_rxfax.c:29:
/usr/local/include/spandsp/arctan2.h: In function `arctan2':
Hi James,
James Golovich wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Florian Overkamp wrote:
gcc -O2 -g -Iinclude -I../include -c -o app_rxfax.o app_rxfax.c
In file included from /usr/local/include/spandsp.h:40,
from app_rxfax.c:29:
/usr/local/include/spandsp/arctan2.h: In function
Eric Wieling wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 09:33, Steve Underwood wrote:
exten = 5678,1,txfax(/tmp/testfax.tif|caller)
There are a zillion fax and tiff formats. I'm trying to figure out what
output format I should tell GhostScript to use. Any suggestions on
which format to try?
These are
Hi all,
My SoftFAX is now up to spandsp-0.0.1h.tar.gz. This version has a number
of changes in the way the V.29 modem works. It also has some missing
functionality in the T.30 implementation filled in - it was not handling
EOM messages.
The previous version failed for several reasons with a
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp
Hi,
This is to confirm that with spandsp-0.0.1h Dialogic VFX/40ESC
faxing started working, a great deal for us! Thank you, Steve.
Will test more ...
There is a downside though - looks like this release causes
page cutoff. We've had it before - 2
Excellent work Steve.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp
Hi all,
My SoftFAX is now up to spandsp-0.0.1h.tar.gz
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 09:33, Steve Underwood wrote:
exten = 5678,1,txfax(/tmp/testfax.tif|caller)
There are a zillion fax and tiff formats. I'm trying to figure out what
output format I should tell GhostScript to use. Any suggestions on
which format to try?
These are the formats GhostScript
Hi Eric,
I was all day trying and came up with this:
gs -q -sDEVICE=tiffg3 -sPAPERSIZE=a4 -r204x196 \
-dNOPAUSE -sOutputFile=$TIFFILE -- $PSFILE
I'm using a modified version of salsafax/sambafax to enable a
print2fax option for windows/linux clients.
You add a printer to cups and share it via
Eric == Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric I'm trying to figure out what output format I should
Eric tell GhostScript to use.
Eric These are the formats GhostScript can output:
Eric faxg3 faxg32d faxg4 tiff12nc tiff24nc tiffcrle
Eric tiffg3 tiffg32d tiffg4 tifflzw tiffpack
Most of
Alex Zarubin wrote:
Hi Steve,
We've got VFX/40ESC and VFX/40ESC plus, tried both. Can send faxes
from our
platform to your system if it helps.
After this problem is (hopefully) solved we are going to try FaxLab
http://www.qualitylogic.com/genoa_test_tools/fax/faxlab.html
Do you know of
Hi,
I've installed spandsp library an RxFAX app on my Gentoo based *
server - here's a little report on the process.
Firstly - my Gentoo box had libtiff 3.6.0 installed, but did not have
/usr/include/tif_dir.h and tiffiop.h.
First thing I did was to copy the two missing headers from
Il 14:27, martedì 23 marzo 2004, Stephen Davies ha scritto:
Hi,
I've installed spandsp library an RxFAX app on my Gentoo based *
server - here's a little report on the process.
[...]
My conclusion - spandsp seems to have a compatibility issue with
tiff-3.6.1. (Unless my install approach was
On Mar 23, 2004, at 8:27 AM, Stephen Davies wrote:
My conclusion - spandsp seems to have a compatibility issue with
tiff-3.6.1. (Unless my install approach was broken). And - you may
want to make the two missing header files available for more than just
3.5.7 of libtiff.
Running gentoo here
Alex Zarubin wrote:
Hi Steve,
We've got VFX/40ESC and VFX/40ESC plus, tried both. Can send faxes
from our
platform to your system if it helps.
I have been testing with a VFX/40ESC. There is a chunk of the T.30 spec
I forgot to implement. I am adding it now. However, the biggest problem
with
On Monday 22 March 2004 18:26, Steve Underwood wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 07:10, Steve Underwood wrote:
I have received more excellent problem report information, and I
have resolved a number of issues affecting my soft FAX machine
when working with various models
Ah. That is a bug. audiofile.h should not be included by any of the
library source files. It should be fixed in the next update.
Regards,
Steve
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2004 18:26, Steve Underwood wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 07:10, Steve
Steve
I am testing Softfax/spandsp with a Brother MFC 1870 MC. It appears to work
properly in the default Standard resolution mode. However, when receiving
a fax sent in Fine mode, the image is garbled. It appears to properly
register the first 1 - 2 of the page, then the rest is junk.
I can
Actually, nix that. The first Standard resolution document went through
OK. The next caused the same scrunched document effect. Is it possible I
have done something wrong?
Thanks
Steve
SNIP
I am testing Softfax/spandsp with a Brother MFC 1870 MC. It appears to
work
properly in the
Hi all,
If you have had trouble with multiple concurrent channels running
app_rxfax or ap_txfax, where was a silly bug. Updated versions are
available at ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp
The latest spandsp-0.0.1f seems to working for quite a lot of people. I
guess there will still be plenty
Hey Steve,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 22:13:37 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi all,
If you have had trouble with multiple concurrent channels running
app_rxfax or ap_txfax, where was a silly bug. Updated versions are
available at ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp
The latest
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp
Hi,
With the latest release available (spandsp-0.0.1f) we still cannot receive
faxes from Dialogic. There are no problems with several fax machines we've tried and
it works fine with J2, so it shouldn't be slipping...
-- Executing RxFAX(Zap/26
On Sunday 21 March 2004 07:10, Steve Underwood wrote:
I have received more excellent problem report information, and I
have resolved a number of issues affecting my soft FAX machine when
working with various models of real FAX machine. The code now seems
to be working with a much greater range
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 07:10, Steve Underwood wrote:
I have received more excellent problem report information, and I
have resolved a number of issues affecting my soft FAX machine when
working with various models of real FAX machine. The code now seems
to be working
: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp
Hi all,
If you have had trouble with multiple concurrent channels running
app_rxfax or ap_txfax, where was a silly bug. Updated versions are
available at ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp
The latest spandsp-0.0.1f seems to working for quite a lot of people. I
guess
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SoftFAX/spandsp
Hi Steve,
We've got VFX/40ESC and VFX/40ESC plus, tried both. Can send faxes from our
platform to your system if it helps.
After this problem is (hopefully) solved we are going to try FaxLab
http://www.qualitylogic.com/genoa_test_tools/fax
Hi,
I have received more excellent problem report information, and I have
resolved a number of issues affecting my soft FAX machine when working
with various models of real FAX machine. The code now seems to be
working with a much greater range of fax machines. A problem affecting
the
Hi all,
It seems this week's release of spandsp fixed the major problems in the
previous release, but still people have had a lot of trouble. Working
with some of those who tried the software and gave me good feedback, I
have identified some apparently common bugs in fax machines, and I have
Hi Steve.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:06:46 +0800
Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
There is now a new tarball at
ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.1b.tar.gz Please try
this, and report any problems you find. This version has the following
changes:
A
Hi,
-Original Message-
Some fax machines send a little less than the specified
1.5 seconds of training test data, so the training test
failed every time. I now only look for 1.25seconds of
training test data.
I think this is still on the long side? I have a few fax-services
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Softfax/spandsp
Hi,
This week's spandsp release is a big step ahead, there are no problems
so far receiving faxes from our HP OfficeJet R80xi and Panafax UF-560.
Still, we cannot get anything from our Dialogic fax boards. It goes like this:
-- Executing
Dear Steve
sorry for my last bug report (not full reported well) I have now reinstall
your spandsp 1b but i have this type of error...
-
Test Fax station Canon B150
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Softfax/spandsp
Hi,
We've tried J2 faxing with the newest release of spandsp and found
the same issue as with our own Dialogic based faxing.
Steve, we can fax to your system from our platform and/or J2 if you
think it can help.
Here is what we see on incoming
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Softfax/spandsp - page cut-off
Hi,
Faxing from Dialogic and J2 is one problem. Another problem is a page
cut-off - happened 2 times out of 7-8 when faxing from the real fax machine.
...
Get at 9600
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Softfax/spandsp
Hi,
Can we do anything about this:
-- Executing RxFAX(Zap/38-1, /usr/tmp/nativefax.tif) in new stack
Changed from phase 0 to 1
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Start receiving document
Changed from phase 1
Dear Steve
I have try your very nice app for * but i have found the problem (see
down) when i receive a fax to extension, can you give some more info about
it?
Another question how can i send a fax to a specified number?
Thanks in advance
Dimitri
51 matches
Mail list logo
