Brian,
I am reluctant to post against you. However, for my previous 2 emails
simply based on facts you as a third person have over-responded, with
no good reasons, in the exact way that you commented me. YOU proved
yourself, not me.
Are you that guy the phone number is associated with? That'll
] Why should I answer a Newbie
question,therethick!
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 11:01 -0500, Race Vanderdecken wrote:
This list is owned by no one.
Actually it is owned by Digium. It has many contributers though.
When someone drives off the road into a ditch in a snow storm they
last
thing
Vincent wrote:
Hi all,
You don't want to be fooled by - -. This guy has NO
business ethic. When He refused to realize a business deal in which I
agreed to pay for his coding help for me, will he personally pay for
the hosting of the list? More interestingly, he mentioned in the list
that he lives
On March 5, 2005 01:39 am, Jonathan Hobbs wrote:
Ignore them and they will go away.
Only after polluting the list with incessant How do I do X? messages, and
then only after subsequently polluting the list with asterisk sucks
messages, and then all the bad karma of some clueless twitt who
It's nice to see that some people think so highly of
themselves and are above all others. It's quite
amusing to watch people like you give thinking so
highly of yourself and so little of others. In the
spirit of Asterisk and Mark's organization-Digium, I
certainly could understand why you aren't
On March 5, 2005 10:48 am, asterisk phones wrote:
It's nice to see that some people think so highly of
themselves and are above all others. It's quite
amusing to watch people like you give thinking so
highly of yourself and so little of others. In the
spirit of Asterisk and Mark's
I really don't like speaking about it, since it's a topic that will
never go away on it's own if we don't speak about it, nor will it go
away if we do speak about it. Remember yesterdays wannabees are todays
newbies, and todays newbies are tomorrows experts, and so on. The
newbies that see this
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
*snipped
Sometimes it is not the if you make a search, often is for new comers
what to aks for.
If you do not know the specific term, than you need to ask somewhere,
and I think the list is good for that.
*snipped
no, if you don't know a 'term' you search for a glossary!
- Original Message -
From: David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure. So say, I tried a Googling for X, but I didn't have any luck.
Then
I looked at pages X and Y in the Wiki, but couldn't find anything that
related to my problem. People are a lot more sympathetic if you
demonstrate
- Original Message -
From: David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, sometimes that works. But I've been on a lot of lists where newbies
who thought they were being ignored started flaming people for not
responding to them, writing posts badmouthing the project, hijacking other
threads,
Jeff Busch wrote and I modified:
***
Asterisk is a Open Source community and supported by volunteers.
Please do the following before asking one of these volunteers for help.
1. Before asking a question, do a Google search
2. After a general
To paraphrase:
Ignore them and they will go away.
- Original Message -
From: David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: March 4, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: [OT] - [Asterisk-Users] Why should I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Race
Vanderdecken
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:57 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why should I answer a Newbie
question,therethick!
If some one would
- Original Message -
Look, don't answer lame questions if you don't want to. Flaming a newb
for being a newb is just mean. (they will eventually RTFM or STFW or
they will fail). This is the way of the open source community.
Here Here, I'm with you. I find it a constant source of
Discussion
Subject: [OT] - [Asterisk-Users] Why should I answer a Newbie
question,therethick!
If you really want to do this the asterisk list is based off of mailman.
You can learn all about mailman here:
http://list.org/
But really, what are the odds that newbs will know to go there first?
Are you
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 17:59 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
- Original Message -
Look, don't answer lame questions if you don't want to. Flaming a newb
for being a newb is just mean. (they will eventually RTFM or STFW or
they will fail). This is the way of the open source community.
] Why should I answer a Newbie
question,therethick!
The payment is not always monetary. Sometimes the payment is just a
showing of sufficient effort. Back to your snow driver analogy, if the
driver in the ditch is just waiting in the car for you to come over and
push them out without even
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 17:59 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
- Original Message -
Look, don't answer lame questions if you don't want to. Flaming a newb
for being a newb is just mean. (they will eventually RTFM or STFW or
they will fail). This is the way of
Title: Re: [OT] - [Asterisk-Users] Why should I answer a Newbie question,therethick!
Look. Lets make it
simple.
In most cases, if a guru is bored or not
interested in a noob question they just ignore it. Personally, I find
myself answering some of these specifically because I am
Arrgh,
Why should I answer a Newbie question, they are thick!
Why is it so difficult to just ignore any question with Newbie in it?
Everyone has to start somewhere. At least the newbie found the list.
The worse you can do is kick sand in their face. No newbie's means no
new customers or
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 11:01 -0500, Race Vanderdecken wrote:
This list is owned by no one.
Actually it is owned by Digium. It has many contributers though.
When someone drives off the road into a ditch in a snow storm they last
thing they need is someone telling them they should have invested
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 11:01 -0500, Race Vanderdecken wrote:
Why is it so difficult to just ignore any question with Newbie in it?
Because if nobody reads their questions they won't get any answers, and
until you read the question you don't know if it is an idiot question.
Everyone has to
On March 2, 2005 11:27 am, Steven Critchfield wrote:
As a person who spent 9 hours in traffic last winter just to drive 15
miles due to idiots who should have just stayed home, I think your
analogy breaks down.
At some point, you either need to learn to drive or you pay someone else
to
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why should I answer a Newbie
question,therethick!
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 11:01 -0500, Race
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:01:38 -0500, Race Vanderdecken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When someone drives off the road into a ditch in a snow storm they last
thing they need is someone telling them they should have invested in
snow chains and defensive driving lessons before leaving the house.
25 matches
Mail list logo
