At 4PM CST (GMT -6) today, we will be moving the bugs.digium.com issue
tracker to a new hosting server. For approximately one hour, the site
will be unavailable, but once it returns everything should be back to
normal; there will be no changes in user accounts or any other data on
the site.
After
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Doug Lytle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tracker seems to be down.
Can't be! Mark once told me, "The bug tracker is never on vacation!"
after I chided him on how much he worked when on vacation.
___
-- Bandwidth and Coloc
Tracker seems to be down.
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
as
On 22:06, Wed 24 Oct 07, Michiel van Baak wrote:
> On 15:38, Wed 24 Oct 07, Doug Lytle wrote:
> >
> > The bug tracker seems to be down.
>
> And so is the public svn and downloads.digium.com and
> ftp.digium.com and the websvn.
> They are working on it.
And it's working again for me
--
Michiel
On 15:38, Wed 24 Oct 07, Doug Lytle wrote:
>
> The bug tracker seems to be down.
And so is the public svn and downloads.digium.com and
ftp.digium.com and the websvn.
They are working on it.
--
Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/l
The bug tracker seems to be down.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digit
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > Fine... so how do you file an enhancement request then? If there's no
> > way to file an enhancement request, then this is the most appropriate
> > place to file this.
>
> The bug tracker is really is not a good place for feature requests. You
> have
> On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 08:32 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> Someone with the id of
>> 'russell' in his infinite wisdom has deemed that this isn't a bug,
>> closed it, and given me -2 karma points.
There may be developers/bug marshalls who close bugs without considering
the user's issues in de
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 08:32 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I opened bug #0007490 the other day. The issue was that when you do a
> 'sip debug' on the Asterisk console, there was no way to have this
> output go _only_ to the messages file. Someone with the id of
> 'russell' in his infinite wisdom
On Jul 27, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote: I opened bug #0007490 the other day. The issue was that when you do a 'sip debug' on the Asterisk console, there was no way to have this output go _only_ to the messages file. Someone with the id of 'russell' in his infinite wisdom has deemed tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:48 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] bugs.digium.com
>
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 10:32, Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
Dear All,
I just wanted to comment on this point of the discussion:
> In a PRODUCTION environment, you can't be running a sip debug to your
> console.
In a PRODUCTION environment you have all of these issues
worked out in your
test lab before deploying to production.
I do agree with Doug
I hate to say this but you might just have hit a 'reap what you sow'
moment - you don't hesitate to trash Asterisk on this mailing list
when you can't make it do what you think it should do, and just maybe
this affects how the developers treat requests from you on the bug
tracker?
Just a thought.
On Thursday 27 July 2006 10:32, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> It clearly is a bug, or at the VERY least, a limitation that needs to be
> fixed. So why the hell did he give me -2 karma points and say 'not actually
> a bug'. Fine... so how do you file an enhancement request then? If there's
> no way to f
I opened bug
#0007490 the other day. The issue was that when you do a 'sip debug' on the
Asterisk console, there was no way to have this output go _only_ to the messages
file. Someone with the id of 'russell' in his infinite wisdom has deemed that
this isn't a bug, closed it, and given me -2
Over the past few days you will notice that alot of the patches submited
to bugs.digium.com now have a status of acknowledged. You may be asking
why? Well to help Mark focus on real "bugs" is why. In addition anything
flagged as acknowledged needs to be tested... and trust me LOTS AND LOTS
of fe
Works fine with Safari on MacOS X, FWIW.
JT
Is anyone else having trouble accessing it with something besides IE on a
Windows box? Opera on Mac/FreeBSD/Linux just hangs at the login page, IE
on Mac and Netscape on Solaris & Linux explode when loading
login_page.php.
_
On Monday 04 August 2003 02:16 pm, James Sharp wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble accessing it with something besides
> IE on a Windows box? Opera on Mac/FreeBSD/Linux just hangs at the
> login page, IE on Mac and Netscape on Solaris & Linux explode when
> loading login_page.php.
No, it works
Hehe, that's slightly ironic... =P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Sharp
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] bugs.digium.com
Is anyone else having trouble accessing it
Is anyone else having trouble accessing it with something besides IE on a
Windows box? Opera on Mac/FreeBSD/Linux just hangs at the login page, IE
on Mac and Netscape on Solaris & Linux explode when loading
login_page.php.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing lis
20 matches
Mail list logo
