RE: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-24 Thread Carlos
riday, June 24, 2005 9:50 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :) if you're looking for a less expensive, cinch to configure channel bank, I would look at the Rhino Channel Bank (http:// www.channelbanks.com). I must ad

Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-24 Thread Bryce Chidester
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :) The idea is that the channel bank breaks a T1/E1/J1 in to channels. There are newer channel type devices that are just gateways. I am sure there are benefits of doing it each way. On 6/23/

RE: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-24 Thread Carlos
ssage- From: Andrew Latham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :) The idea is that the channel bank breaks a T1/E1/J1 in to channels. There are newer channel

Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-23 Thread rkb
Would it help if I post the zapata.conf and queues.conf files? zapata.conf: [channels] context=incomingpri switchtype=national signalling=pri_cpe rxwink=100 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-23 Thread Peter Svensson
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andrew Latham wrote: > On 6/23/05, Seamus Abshere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what I'm confused about: > > * two 4 port FXS cards > > * one 24 port FXS channel bank > > both, neither, and if both -- why do you need the dual digium cards? > > shouldn't your channel ba

Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-23 Thread Andrew Latham
The idea is that the channel bank breaks a T1/E1/J1 in to channels. There are newer channel type devices that are just gateways. I am sure there are benefits of doing it each way. On 6/23/05, Seamus Abshere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's what I'm confused about: > * two 4 port FXS cards > * o

Re: [Asterisk-Users] so many FXS ports :)

2005-06-23 Thread Seamus Abshere
That's what I'm confused about: * two 4 port FXS cards * one 24 port FXS channel bank both, neither, and if both -- why do you need the dual digium cards? shouldn't your channel bank just take MGCP or SIP or something? What am I missing? [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Shawn guessed correctly; "Most