t: Re: [asterisk-users] Stun Server
We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP
box in our datacenter. What should I look at that would be a good
replacement. The windows box has worked bu
We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP
box in our datacenter. What should I look at that would be a good
replacement. The windows box has worked but the hardware is at end of life
a
On Thursday 11 May 2006 21:10, Moises Silva wrote:
> Thanks for the fix :)
no problem
> About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
> Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
> installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hi
Thanks for the fix :)
About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hints
about where the problem might be.
Try using the stunclient applic
On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:32, Moises Silva wrote:
> I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
> it on the web, you can get it in
>
> http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebu
>ild.tar.bz2
>
> Let me know if you it have bugs
I'm not lu
I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
it on the web, you can get it in
http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebuild.tar.bz2
Let me know if you it have bugs
Regards
On 5/11/06, Serghei Amelian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thur
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:51, Moises Silva wrote:
>I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
> server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are
I known what do a stun server.
> getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
> o
I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are
getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
or password in your voip phone.
Any way, if you are still interested in having the stun pro
Hi list,
I want to setup a stun server. I tried stun server from vovida and mystun, but
my voip phone said that "logon failed". When I use stun.xten.com works fine.
This is vovida stun in verbose mode:
***received on A1:P1
Got a request (len=28) from xxx.186.145.226:5060
Received stun messa
Hi,
Do we need STUN server with Asterisk(1.2.6) for SIP phones which are using
NAT on different networks ???
Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi!
Asterisk supports NAT!
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Avoid+SIP+NAT+Traversal
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sip+nat+solutions
/Madhawa
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:17:14 -0500, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Does asterisk have in itself an STUN server built in? Or do I n
Hi,
Does asterisk have in itself an STUN server built in? Or do I need to
set one up seperately? And if that is the case, what is recommended
for use with asterisk (to allow VOIP users behind nats to connect to
my VOIP servers)
Matt
___
Asterisk-Users
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/ works fine for me. Tested
on debian sarge with one NIC and two IP addresses for this NIC.
Klaus
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
___
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
I don't know which server is the best one, I'm using the one from IPtel.org.
You need two IP addresses for STUN to work, with a proper implementation
yo
I just put multiple IPs on the same interface and use -a .
Seems to work fine.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/m
STUN can be nice when connecting to Asterisk behind
NAT in some situations. X-Lite/Pro softphones,
Grandstream Budgetones and a few other clients make
great use of STUN.
That being said, the only good (free) STUN server I've
seen is the Vovida one that requires two NICs. It
works very well, if tha
AJ Grinnell wrote:
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
Asterisk does not require STUN.
Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or up
Only hard phones with STUN support that I am aware of are Grandstream and
SNOM. I am sure the Cisco ATA186 does not support STUN.
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 09:11, James Sizemore wrote:
> The client device has to support stun.
> Bugetones do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
>
> Dave Cotton wrot
I would suggest you use the Vovida STUN CVS Version. It worked fine on our
RedHat 7.3. Look though the Vovida mail archives to learn where it is
exactly. And no...this is not a fix for all the NAT troubles, STUN does not
work with Symmetric NATs. But the good point is that Symmetric NATs ar
The client device has to support stun.
Bugetones do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
Dave Cotton wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
Sorry to answer a question with a question..
Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
I've also never been able
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
> Sorry to answer a question with a question..
>
> Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
>
I've also never been able to figure out stund, if that is possible
wouldn't it be the answer to most of the SIP difficulties.
-
Sorry to answer a question with a question..
Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
Later..
> Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
>
> compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
> configure. It isn't starting...it tries to
Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just
craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund
#!/bin/echo Not to execute.
# Path to stund
STUND=/usr
24 matches
Mail list logo
