Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:35:20 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
>> > On Monday 13 July 2009 17:19:15 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> >> Is any *.conf file (which permits #exec) guaranteed to be read before
>> >> extensions.ael? It would then be possible to
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:35:20 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > On Monday 13 July 2009 17:19:15 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> >> Is there a specific reason not to permit #exec in AEL files?
> >
> > It wasn't coded that way, and it's parsed in a completely different way
> > than an
Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> On Monday 13 July 2009 17:19:15 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Is there a specific reason not to permit #exec in AEL files?
>
> It wasn't coded that way, and it's parsed in a completely different way than
> any other Asterisk configuration file. I don't know the reason Murf
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Tilghman Lesher <
tilgh...@mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:
> On Monday 13 July 2009 17:19:15 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> > Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > > On Monday 13 July 2009 01:03:48 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> > >> Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
> > >> > Is Asterisk s
On Monday 13 July 2009 17:19:15 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > On Monday 13 July 2009 01:03:48 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> >> Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
> >> > Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
> >
> > The directive "#exec" is not permitted in an A
Steve Edwards schrieb:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiousity (haven't got to AEL yet), should these exec's be
>> re-written as AGI calls?
>
> An exec is executed when the file is reloaded by Asterisk.
Except that in the case of AEL the #exec is not executed at
Danny Nicholas schrieb:
> Just out of curiousity (haven't got to AEL yet), should these exec's be
> re-written as AGI calls?
I don't think so. #exec's and AGI() are two entirely different
concepts.
Philipp Kempgen
--
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.amooma.de
Gesch
Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> On Monday 13 July 2009 01:03:48 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
>> > Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
> The directive "#exec" is not permitted in an AEL configuration file.
I see, that would explain why it doesn't wor
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> Just out of curiousity (haven't got to AEL yet), should these exec's be
> re-written as AGI calls?
An exec is executed when the file is reloaded by Asterisk.
An AGI, well, you know :)
--
Thanks in advance,
--
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] #exec in #include'd file
On Monday 13 July 2009 01:03:48 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
> > Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
>
&g
On Monday 13 July 2009 01:03:48 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
> > Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
>
> I should probably add that it doesn't work for me in case that wasn't
> obvious.
>
> NOTICE[14143]: ael.flex:878 setup_filestack: --Read in
Philipp Kempgen schrieb:
> Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
I should probably add that it doesn't work for me in case that wasn't
obvious.
NOTICE[14143]: ael.flex:878 setup_filestack: --Read in included file
/e-globals.ael, 1999 chars
ERROR[14143]: ael.y:812
Hi,
Is Asterisk supposed to evaluate #exec's in an #include'd file?
Philipp Kempgen
--
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998
Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.
13 matches
Mail list logo