What makes you think anyone doesn't understand that? The problem is the
chip on the X100P isn't made any more, and X100P cards are no longer so
plentiful. You'll notice the price is going up. They aren't $5 any more.
Several Winmodem chips are still readily available, and so are cards
Martin wrote:
I wonder why people don't get it ? X100P is a winmodem was and always will be.
What makes you think anyone doesn't understand that? The problem is the
chip on the X100P isn't made any more, and X100P cards are no longer so
plentiful. You'll notice the price is going up. They
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:28:44PM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
Several Winmodem chips are still readily available, and so are cards
containing them. What is missing is someone putting the effort into
making drivers for them.
Can you list, off the top of your head, modems for which the
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:28:44PM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
Several Winmodem chips are still readily available, and so are cards
containing them. What is missing is someone putting the effort into
making drivers for them.
Can you list, off the top of
On April 1, 2009 01:32:18 pm Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
I don't think a off the shelf modem has the necessary DSPs to convert
voice to codecthat is why a Voice Gateway/Analog Telephony Adapter
or FXO/FXS cards exist instead of modem having a second life.
There are no DSPs in any of the
If half-duplex audio is good enough for you, sure.
You've lost me there. I am not aware of a modem that is for sale today that is
half duplex. (OK some support a couple of minor half duplex modes). All state
of the art modem protocols send and receive simultaneously using the full 300 -
3000
- Wilton Helm wh...@compuserve.com wrote:
If half-duplex audio is good enough for you, sure.
You've lost me there. I am not aware of a modem that is for sale today that is
half duplex. (OK some support a couple of minor half duplex modes). All state
of the art modem protocols send and
calls ,etc.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Wilton
Helm
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:06 PM
To: Asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] [Zaptel] Why no driver for PCI voice
modems?
If half
Tim Nelson wrote:
- Wilton Helm wh...@compuserve.com wrote:
If half-duplex audio is good enough for you, sure.
You've lost me there. I am not aware of a modem that is for sale
today that is half duplex. (OK some support a couple of minor half
duplex modes). All state of the art
Fred wrote:
Hello
Considering how cheap PCI modems are compared to even the cheapest
PCI hardware from Digium, OpenVox, Sangoma, etc I was wondering
why Zaptel can't be used with those to connect an Asterisk server to
a POTS line for low-level use? It just seems overkill for SOHO
I wonder why people don't get it ? X100P is a winmodem was and always will be.
Martin
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
If the primary purpose is to drive down cost, why not simply buy any one of
the existing 'Wildcard X100P' clone cards that are
Hello
Considering how cheap PCI modems are compared to even the cheapest
PCI hardware from Digium, OpenVox, Sangoma, etc I was wondering
why Zaptel can't be used with those to connect an Asterisk server to
a POTS line for low-level use? It just seems overkill for SOHO users
who only get a
Fred wrote:
Hello
Considering how cheap PCI modems are compared to even the cheapest
PCI hardware from Digium, OpenVox, Sangoma, etc I was wondering
why Zaptel can't be used with those to connect an Asterisk server to
a POTS line for low-level use? It just seems overkill for SOHO
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Fred wrote:
Hello
Considering how cheap PCI modems are compared to even the cheapest
PCI hardware from Digium, OpenVox, Sangoma, etc I was wondering
why Zaptel can't be used with those to connect an Asterisk server to
a POTS line for
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:09:39 Fred wrote:
Considering how cheap PCI modems are compared to even the cheapest
PCI hardware from Digium, OpenVox, Sangoma, etc I was wondering
why Zaptel can't be used with those to connect an Asterisk server to
a POTS line for low-level use? It just seems
15 matches
Mail list logo
