Re: [asterisk-users] [asterisk-app-dev] ARI Node JS Bridge.addChannel

2019-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:25, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: >> Hiya, >> >> I would have expected this to show the channels in the bridge inside >> the anonymous function - it shows the bridge is empty though? >> >>var bri

Re: [asterisk-users] [asterisk-app-dev] ARI Node JS Bridge.addChannel

2019-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:25, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: >> Hiya, >> >> I would have expected this to show the channels in the bridge inside >> the anonymous function - it shows the bridge is empty though? >> >> var brid

Re: [asterisk-users] [asterisk-app-dev] ARI Node JS Bridge.addChannel

2019-01-07 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: > Hiya, > > I would have expected this to show the channels in the bridge inside > the anonymous function - it shows the bridge is empty though? > > var bridge = ari.Bridge(); > bridge.create({ >

[asterisk-users] [asterisk-app-dev] ARI Node JS Bridge.addChannel

2019-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
Hiya, I would have expected this to show the channels in the bridge inside the anonymous function - it shows the bridge is empty though? var bridge = ari.Bridge(); bridge.create({ type: 'holding',