On 8/10/10 6:02 AM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> FWIW, "open source" is only "truly dead" when you can't find anywhere to
> download the source.
It wasn't ever Open Source, and source was never provided. I checked a
while ago and that's never likely to happen, so yep (at least as of last
time) it is
On Thu, October 7, 2010 1:02 pm, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> FWIW, "open source" is only "truly dead" when you can't find anywhere to
> download the source.
I *totally* agree... if you can find me the source. I have, at this
moment, at least, no reason to believe ADA is OSS -- indeed, looking at
it,
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ADA: DOA?
2010/10/7 Paul Hayes
2010/10/7 Paul Hayes
> On 06/10/10 20:25, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> > Hey, all. While ADA can still be downloaded, that's about all that I
> see.
> > No development, no recent mention, and -- perhaps worst of all -- it
> > appears not to work properly under 64-bit systems. So, assuming Digium's
On 06/10/10 20:25, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hey, all. While ADA can still be downloaded, that's about all that I see.
> No development, no recent mention, and -- perhaps worst of all -- it
> appears not to work properly under 64-bit systems. So, assuming Digium's
> abandoned it, are there any su
Hey, all. While ADA can still be downloaded, that's about all that I see.
No development, no recent mention, and -- perhaps worst of all -- it
appears not to work properly under 64-bit systems. So, assuming Digium's
abandoned it, are there any suggestions of alternatives? Right now, I'm
replaci