In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonas Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call File
=== Call File ==
channel: Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
maxretries: 3
retrytime: 60
waittime: 60
callerid: Test *66
application: AGI
data: test.agi|670507
=
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonas Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call File
=== Call File ==
channel: Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
maxretries: 3
retrytime: 60
waittime: 60
callerid: Test *66
application: AGI
data:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonas Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonas Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call File
=== Call File ==
channel: Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
maxretries: 3
Tony Mountifield wrote:
a separate context [foo], with a wildcard extension _X., which will match
any extension of two or more digits. I then put the extension number into
the parameter list for the AGI.
So instead of generating data: test.agi|12345 in the call file you
generate extension:
Guys,
The problem was that the IAX2 channel accepted both ulaw and gsm codec.
Once I dropped the gsm alternative in the iax.conf the interaction with
the AGI scripts (DTMF) worked great. So it seems that the ulaw was
picked if the IAX call was initiated by the IAX phone and hit the AGI
script
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jonas Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem was that the IAX2 channel accepted both ulaw and gsm codec.
Once I dropped the gsm alternative in the iax.conf the interaction with
the AGI scripts (DTMF) worked great. So it seems that the ulaw was
picked if the
Hi Guys,
I have already tried this one on the developers list. I have not been
successful getting much back there and I have notified them that I will
post this on the users list instead. Hopefully somebody have tried
something similar and can help out.
I am developing AGI scripts on Asterisk
Jonas Arndt wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have already tried this one on the developers list. I have not been
successful getting much back there and I have notified them that I will
post this on the users list instead. Hopefully somebody have tried
something similar and can help out.
I am developing
