Re: [asterisk-users] AMI interface problem

2009-01-09 Thread Barry L. Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Michelson wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I have located the erroneous code and have fixed it in subversion, revision 161490. The next rc of 1.6.0 will not have this bug. Mark -- This bug still exists in the recently-released

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI interface problem

2009-01-09 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Friday 09 January 2009 14:56:17 Barry L. Kline wrote: Mark Michelson wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I have located the erroneous code and have fixed it in subversion, revision 161490. The next rc of 1.6.0 will not have this bug. This bug still exists in the recently-released

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI interface problem

2009-01-09 Thread Barry L. Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tilghman Lesher wrote: Mark erroneously assumed there would be another release candidate, which there was not. So while it's not in 1.6.0.3, it will be in the 1.6.0.4 release, when that occurs. Thanks Tilghman. I wait with bated breath. Best

[asterisk-users] AMI interface problem

2008-12-05 Thread Jim Dickenson
I installed version 1.6.0.3-rc1 and my AMI application stopped working. I reinstalled 1.6.0.1 and it worked again. I reinstalled 1.6.0.3-rc1 and it stopped. Looks like a problem in the software to me. Following the same steps using the same code for the AMI and conf files for * I get bad behavior

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI interface problem

2008-12-05 Thread Mark Michelson
Jim Dickenson wrote: I installed version 1.6.0.3-rc1 and my AMI application stopped working. I reinstalled 1.6.0.1 and it worked again. I reinstalled 1.6.0.3-rc1 and it stopped. Looks like a problem in the software to me. Following the same steps using the same code for the AMI and conf