Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on
timing or disk throughput, and you can't just ask them to do ssd - its
a virtual machine! 500 simultaneous recordings is a hefty load, and I
would want to know that the underlying hardware is dedicated to the task.
Sure
Digital ocean offers ssd on all the virtual machines. Uptime is good.
Jai Rangi
Www.didforsale.com
www.cebodtelecom.com
www.cebod.com
On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Amazon instances are shared resources. I wouldn't want to count on timing or
disk
Still a shared resource. I don't see the benefit.
Even beyond the shared resource bit, with the kind of IO you are likely
to be pushing, you will want a decent NAS with lots of spindles and
fibre channel to your hosts.
j
On 03/08/2015 10:51 AM, Jai Rangi wrote:
Digital ocean offers ssd
Agreed, network will be bottleneck even with ssd on shared resource. For a
stable env having a dedicated hosted server will be the best approach and
cheaper too.
Jai Rangi
Www.didforsale.com
www.cebodtelecom.com
www.cebod.com
On Mar 8, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Hi
I plan to host Asterisk instances on AWS/EC2 servers.
Requirement is to run asterisk instance with transcoding (g.729 + g.711) and
full recording. Number of concurrent calls expected are 500+. 2 instances will
be configured for 100% redundancy. Heart beat will be used to determine active
Why use Amazon? With that kind of load I would want dedicated servers.
Call Rackspace or Softlayer.
j
On 03/06/2015 11:59 AM, Amit Patkar wrote:
Hi
I plan to host Asterisk instances on AWS/EC2 servers.
Requirement is to run asterisk instance with transcoding (g.729 +
g.711) and full
Hi Jeff
Are you aware of any challenges of hosting it on AWS? It will help me to
work out alternate plan. Is there any recommendation? Should I split it
to multiple instances and balance traffic across multiple small server
instances? I can use Kamailio to balance traffic.
I see many posts
