On 1/30/09, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
> > Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the
> > 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox.
> >
> > I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list
> > more consis
Noah Miller wrote:
The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be
announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not.
The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and
that most subscribers to it would not apprec
> The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be
> announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not.
> The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list
> and
> that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all t
Matt Florell wrote:
> Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the
> 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox.
>
> I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list
> more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list,
David Backeberg schrieb:
> Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS
> feed?
>
> My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how
> many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff
> against last get | sendmail
> you get t
Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS feed?
My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how
many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff
against last get | sendmail
you get the idea
Perhaps downloads.digium.com ha
Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the
1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox.
I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list
more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last
1.4 one was December
For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release
announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23
release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking
in the wrong place?
We always do compatibility testing before putting a new release in
production
On Thursday 29 January 2009 13:50:19 Remco Barendse wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote:
> >> 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me.
> >>
> >> I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest
> >> zapt
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote:
>> 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me.
>>
>> I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest
>> zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was
On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote:
> 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me.
>
> I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest
> zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was
> trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pi
1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me.
I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest
zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was
trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension
just got dead audio and the next phone
The Asterisk.org development team has announced the release of Asterisk
1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5. These releases are available for
immediate download from http://downloads.digium.com/.
This update for Asterisk includes a security fix for chan_iax2. Please see the
associated securi
13 matches
Mail list logo
