On 12/09/11 09:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and
1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with
SIP + NAT.
The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN
(congestion).
Can you define NAT
Hello
i am not sure if this has been discussed before..
i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent
calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90%
i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at
100 concurrent
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Sawah tareksa...@hotmail.com wrote:
i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed
at 100 concurrent calls.
please advise?
Nobody will know why your asterisk crashed unless you follow the
instructions here:
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Hello
i am not sure if this has been discussed before..
i have an asterisk 1.4
9993
From: da...@debsinc.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in
that branch
: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with
session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4.
do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6?
Tarek Sawah
Information Technology Adviser
Integrated Digital
On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not
to.
You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big
issue. A performance regressions and timerfd.
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
On 09/12/11 14:08, Paul Belanger wrote:
On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not
to.
You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big
issue. A performance regressions and timerfd.
--
Paul
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Nik
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script
On 01/16/10 04:27, Bruce Nik wrote:
Hi Guys,
Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx
with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would
install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system?
If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS.
Use kickstart to configure your default packages, and then set up a
shell script to install the additional stuff you need.
:)
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 08:48:27PM +1100, Rob Hillis wrote:
On 01/16/10 04:27, Bruce Nik wrote:
Hi Guys,
Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx
with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would
install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS
On 01/17/10 01:15, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Try PBX-in-a-Flash. Undoubtedly it won't do everything you want out of
the box, but I suspect it will do /most/ of what you want out of the box.
But will not let you debug that install script. I tend to distrust
running such a hidden script
Hi Guys,
Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it)
are there any automated install scripts out there that would install
Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system?
If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS.
Thanks,
Bruce
--
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it)
are there any automated install scripts out there that would install
Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system?
If the script
Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would
like to see an easy install script which can install it all.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote:
Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would
like to see an easy install script which can install it all.
tar xvzf
./configure
make
(optional, do a 'make menuconfig')
make install
But the
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script
for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would
like to see an easy install script which can install it all
Hi,
I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I
should avoid it.
What are the advantages of upgrading?
And finally, why both versions are available? Why not just scrap 1.4?
Many thanks
Dan Journo
___
-- Bandwidth
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Dan Journo
d...@keshercommunications.com wrote:
I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I
should avoid it.
Try searching the list for the many times this has been answered.
Since this is your choice, you need to set up a parallel
Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes:
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in
extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones'
[Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto:
Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes:
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in
extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones'
[Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto:
Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER'
On Monday 20 April 2009 05:46:17 Rob Hillis wrote:
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes:
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1'
in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones'
[Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in
extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones'
[Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto:
Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label
PHONE NUMBER = the number I called.
Michael wrote:
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in
extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones'
[Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto:
Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label
PHONE NUMBER = the
Hi,
I agree with Gordon.
We are still using Asterisk 1.2 because we are waiting for Asterisk 1.4
features to work as for Asterisk 1.2 (it seems to us that parking and
queues have some problems... so not good enough for production).
Giorgio Incantalupo
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct
Brendan Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a
supported,
stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I
were
starting today, I'd go with 1.4.
1.6.0 has
Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6.
My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I
will use GSM audio codec.
Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN.
What Asterisk version is better to me and why ???
Thank
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Alejandro Facultad wrote:
Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6.
There is also 1.2. It may not be supported but there are 1000's of people
out there (myself included) who are still using it.
My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a
supported,
stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I
were
starting today, I'd go with 1.4.
1.6.0 has just been released.
Personally I'd start with
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6.
My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I
will use GSM audio codec.
Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN.
What
Brendan Martens wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a
supported,
stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I
were
starting today, I'd go with 1.4.
1.6.0 has just been
Yes, that is what I did, I used overlay but I had a hard time to unmak it.
The 1.4 is not even in the portage unstable and it was masked in:
/usr/portage/profile/package.mask
True. The asterisk packages in the voip overlay aren't particularly up-to-date.
If I had more knowledge of Portage and
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:05:17PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage
but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I
don't think there
will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage.
You can use the gentoo voip overlay. Asterisk 1.4.21.2 is included in
the overlay.
# emerge layman
# layman -a voip
You may need to modify some of the .ebuild files, or your
/etc/portage/packages.unmask depending on your asterisk build.
Regards,
Chris
On 09/24/08 14:12, Chris Bagnall wrote:
You can use the gentoo voip overlay. Asterisk 1.4.21.2 is included in
the overlay.
# emerge layman
# layman -a voip
You may need to modify some of the .ebuild files, or your
/etc/portage/packages.unmask depending on your asterisk build.
Regards,
1.6 = Windows Vista :-P
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo
portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling
and I don't think there
will be any newer version
I would think
1.6 = Windows Vista
:)
PaulH
Steve Totaro wrote:
1.6 = Windows Vista :-P
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from
Gentoo portage but I think this
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage
but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't
think there
will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage.
I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Joseph wrote:
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo
portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF
signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available
anytime soon on portage.
I need stable version,
Joseph wrote:
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage
but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I
don't think there
will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage.
I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seysan wrote:
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?
There are release notes that speak to this.
Where? And is
At 06:49 2/19/2008, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seysan wrote:
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?
There
On 13:49, Tue 19 Feb 08, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seysan wrote:
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:49:58PM +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seysan wrote:
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?
thanks
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Seysan wrote:
Hello,
What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ?
Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?
There are release notes that speak to this.
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
47 matches
Mail list logo
