My apologies if this topic was already discussed in the past.
Here is my scenario:
Network A - 192.168.1.0
1 Asterisk
1 Digium phone
Router does NAT from the public IP to asterisk, and forward ports
5060tcp/udp and 10k-20k udp
Network B - 192.168.1.0
1 Digium phone, registering to the public
Subject:[asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
Sent by:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
My apologies if this topic was already discussed in the past.
Here is my scenario:
Network A - 192.168.1.0
1 Asterisk
1 Digium phone
Router does NAT from the public IP
On Thursday 07 February 2013, Frank wrote:
My apologies if this topic was already discussed in the past.
Here is my scenario:
Network A - 192.168.1.0
1 Asterisk
1 Digium phone
Router does NAT from the public IP to asterisk, and forward ports
5060tcp/udp and 10k-20k udp
Network B -
AJS,
That is a solution that I am envisaging.
But I would really love to try to work out with my issue first. It will
allow me to deploy more phones in separates buildlings in the future. If
I do the IAX solution, it means that for every building, I need a box..
Which I would like to prevent.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Frank fr...@efirehouse.com wrote:
AJS,
That is a solution that I am envisaging.
But I would really love to try to work out with my issue first. It will
allow me to deploy more phones in separates buildlings in the future. If I
do the IAX solution, it means
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
AJS,
That is a solution that I am envisaging.
But I would really love to try to work out with my issue first. It will allow
me to deploy more phones in separates buildlings
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:27 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
AJS,
That is a solution that I am
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc: Eric Wieling
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
I thought about that.
I will give it a shot tonight and will post back my results in here.
Thanks
On 2/7/13 12:39 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
The easiest thing
: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
I
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
I don't see how that would really solve anything - instead of the server
sending the 192.168.x.x packets onto the local
mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
Justin Killen
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
I don't see how that would really
: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private
networks
Sent by:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
I'm using Digium Phones.
I still do not understand why it's not possible to do it the way the
networks are right now.
If the options I mentioned in my sip.conf are enough, then both
-8208
From: Frank fr...@efirehouse.com
To: ch...@acsdi.com, Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com,
Date: 02/07/2013 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
Sent by: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com,
Date: 02/07/2013 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk calls between 2 private networks
Sent by: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
I'm using Digium Phones.
I still do
On 8/02/2013, at 6:49 AM, Frank fr...@efirehouse.com wrote:
I thought about that.
I will give it a shot tonight and will post back my results in here.
Thanks
On 2/7/13 12:39 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
The easiest thing to is renumber one of the networks so they are not using
the same
calls between 2 private networks
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:36:36 -0700
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Frank fr...@efirehouse.com wrote:
AJS,
That is a solution that I am envisaging.
But I would really love to try to work out with my issue first
16 matches
Mail list logo