hi,
I have not tested that but I have seen 100 agents configure with asterisk.
thnks
Bhrugu mehta
On 5/15/08, gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Asterisk practically stable and reliable for a larg Enterprise has say a
1 phones , is there any case study like this?
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk for Larg
hi,
I have not tested that but I have seen 100 agents configure with asterisk.
thnks
Bhrugu mehta
On 5/15/08, gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Asterisk practically stable and reliable for a larg Enterprise has say a
1
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk for Larg
hi,
I have not tested that but I have seen 100 agents configure with asterisk.
thnks
Bhrugu mehta
On 5/15/08, gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Asterisk practically stable and reliable
Whoa - you need some highly reliable, TELCO quality iron with some 1st
class support for that.
Do you realize what your downtime in that environment would would cost
you ?
Look, * is cool , fun an customizeable etc.
But it IS NOT carrier grade hardware and it is NOT software produced in
I don't see why you couldn't use asterisk in a setup that large. It would
require a number of servers, and SER to handle the registrations, and call
routing and use asterisk for what its good at, ivr/vm.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
gmail wrote:
Does anybody know how to off-load an Asterisk Box so that to distribute
its functions like IVR and VoiceMail or its PTSN gateway function into
different servers? in this case , will the installation of Asterisk on
each server differe and how these different servers will
Hi,
Steve Totaro schrieb:
I would avoid IAX and use SIP if at all possible.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
Can you some reasons for this? Would interest me a lot why SIP is better
in a large Enviroment. than IAX.
Kind regards,
Tobias
___
-- Bandwidth and
Can you some reasons for this? Would interest me a lot why SIP is better
in a large Enviroment. than IAX.
Because with IAX you cannot separate the signalling and media
resulting in a complex scalability problem.
With SIP you can deploy a SIP Proxy and level load calls across as
many Asterisk
You have the basic idea right, the dial plans are limited down to
specific functions to be provided and then told how to connect to
other features. For example you might have a box that only provide
PSTN connectivity so all calls come in and the dial plan routes the
calls to another box or boxes.
I would avoid IAX and use SIP if at all possible.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Bruce Reeves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have the basic idea right, the dial plans are limited down to
specific functions to be provided and then told how to connect to
other features.
Does anyone know how to off-load an Asterisk Box so that to distribute its
functions like IVR and VoiceMail or its PTSN gateway function into different
servers? in this case , will the installation of Asterisk on each server
differe and how these different servers will interact as a single
Does anybody know how to off-load an Asterisk Box so that to distribute its
functions like IVR and VoiceMail or its PTSN gateway function into different
servers? in this case , will the installation of Asterisk on each server
differe and how these different servers will interact as a single
Hmmm,
IMHO this is a fundamental SIP architecture issue.
To meet my understanding of distribution, this would required a proxy
function before the call answer() on the Asterisk. If , in an
ideal world, this proxy function were to be in the path before
answer(), the proxy would need added
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM, gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know how to off-load an Asterisk Box so that to distribute its
functions like IVR and VoiceMail or its PTSN gateway function into different
servers? in this case , will the installation of Asterisk on each server
14 matches
Mail list logo
