Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-09-07 Thread Benny Amorsen
Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net writes: Imaging my surprise this Monday when I installed a plain old Asterisk 1.4 on a new HP server, a DL380 G6, and could run in circles around the old IBM servers. The G6 series is pure magic for everything I've let it touch network-wise. I have three

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-09-07 Thread Steve Totaro
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dkbenny%2buse...@amorsen.dk wrote: Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net writes: Imaging my surprise this Monday when I installed a plain old Asterisk 1.4 on a new HP server, a DL380 G6, and could run in circles around the

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-27 Thread John Todd
On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: Hello Asterisk users around the world! Recently, I have been working with pretty large Asterisk installations. 300 servers running Asterisk and Kamailio (OpenSER). Replacing large Nortel systems with just a few tiny boxes and other

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-27 Thread asterisk
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Todd Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:54 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news,but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-27 Thread Klaus Darilion
John Todd wrote: 5) Any summary stats on RTP packet loss, etc? (from CHANNEL(rtpqos,audio,all)) on channels? I wonder how to retrieve those stats: - after Dial()? - during Dial()? (how?) regards klaus ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-27 Thread Darryl Dunkin
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news,but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server John Todd wrote: 5) Any summary stats on RTP packet loss, etc? (from CHANNEL(rtpqos,audio,all)) on channels? I wonder how to retrieve those stats: - after Dial

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-26 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 06:18 +1000, Alex Samad wrote: any thoughts of different media like 10G ethernet or infiniband ? For another project i had a look at 10G. Prices of the nic's were reasonable, but even an 5-ports nice were mind blowing (35,000 Euro) So i opted for multiple nic's and

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-26 Thread Peder
-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, John A. Sullivan IIIjsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote: You don't necessarily need a switch to support it.  One can use alb mode in Linux on any old switch and it works reasonably well other

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-26 Thread David Backeberg
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Pederpe...@networkoblivion.com wrote: On a side note, why do people buy high-end servers like IBM or HP and then put in crappy switches, like Dell or Netgear and then wonder why performance is bad?  That's like buying a BMW 7 series and then using the cheapest

[asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Hello Asterisk users around the world! Recently, I have been working with pretty large Asterisk installations. 300 servers running Asterisk and Kamailio (OpenSER). Replacing large Nortel systems with just a few tiny boxes and other interesting solutions. Testing has been a large part of

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Raimund Sacherer
Hi, what machines where the IBM Servers? I would be really interested in this as we have currently IBM Hardware deployed and, well, maybe it's time to investigate in different hardware, best -- Raimund Sacherer - RunSolutions Open Source It Consulting - Email: r...@runsolutions.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote: Hello Asterisk users around the world! Recently, I have been working with pretty large Asterisk installations. 300 servers running Asterisk and Kamailio (OpenSER). Replacing large Nortel systems with just a few tiny

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Olivier
I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the way, this limit is 11000 channels or 5500 calls, isn't it ? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Olle E. Johansson
25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the way, this limit is 11000 channels or 5500 calls, isn't it ? Yes, this is 11.000 channels. Bonding is good advice, provided we

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:28 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the way, this limit is 11000 channels or 5500 calls, isn't it ?

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Olle E. Johansson
25 aug 2009 kl. 18.50 skrev John A. Sullivan III: On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:28 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the way, this limit is

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the way, this limit is 11000 channels or 5500 calls,

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Olle E. Johansson
25 aug 2009 kl. 19.42 skrev Steve Totaro: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: I would be curious to know if bonding 2 Ethernet ports together would help to push the upper limit a bit further ... (by the

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 06:18 +1000, Alex Samad wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:30:08PM +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 18.50 skrev John A. Sullivan III: On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:28 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: [snip]

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:30:08PM +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 18.50 skrev John A. Sullivan III: On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:28 +0200, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 25 aug 2009 kl. 16.20 skrev Olivier: [snip] mode in Linux on any old switch and it works reasonably well

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, John A. Sullivan IIIjsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote: You don't necessarily need a switch to support it.  One can use alb mode in Linux on any old switch and it works reasonably well other than for some excessive ARP traffic.  However, as we found out the

Re: [asterisk-users] Breaking news, but what happened? 11.000 channels on one server

2009-08-25 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:57 -0400, David Backeberg wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, John A. Sullivan IIIjsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote: You don't necessarily need a switch to support it. One can use alb mode in Linux on any old switch and it works reasonably well other than for