Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-13 Thread Tim Panton
On 9 Mar 2007, at 17:51, Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) wrote: I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with * I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes. The * boxes run AGI scri

Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
> I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with * > I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from > the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes. > The * boxes run AGI scripts to process the IVR calls. Can I load balance the

RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread David Ruggles
09, 2007 10:59 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing Anyway, back to your question, how about your head system running an AGI that connects to the manager interface on the IVR boxes to find out how

RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread David Ruggles
Anyway, back to your question, how about your head system running an AGI that connects to the manager interface on the IVR boxes to find out how many calls each is currently processing? You could set a channel variable with the least busy host name and use that in your dial statement.

RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread David Ruggles
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:58 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing "telco servers" are Supermicro 2.8GHz P4, 1GB, Digium te410p with 2 PRI plugged in. "application server" is HP DL380 3.06G

RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread Steve Edwards
erSafe Data, Inc. (910) 285-7200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:21 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call

RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-09 Thread David Ruggles
ECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:21 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David Ruggles wrote: > I&

Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-08 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David Ruggles wrote: I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with * I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes. The * boxes run AGI scripts to process

[asterisk-users] Call load balancing

2007-03-08 Thread David Ruggles
I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with * I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes. The * boxes run AGI scripts to process the IVR calls. Can I load balance the routin

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-11 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload rate since VoIP calls send data bidirectionally. Snip ... Jean-Michel, hi; Is tha

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-11 Thread John Daragon
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: Dave Redmore wrote: Hello All, Wondering what sort of real world mileage people are getting out of different internet connecions - i.e. different DSL connection speeds, cable modems, etc... Is it reasonable to hope to carry 10 - 15 concurrent calls on a 768K DSL?

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-11 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 09:15, Thu 11 Aug 05, tim panton wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2005, at 16:48, Michiel van Baak wrote: > > >On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > > > >>1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic > >>2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic > >> > >> > >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-11 Thread tim panton
On 10 Aug 2005, at 16:48, Michiel van Baak wrote:On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: 1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic If they fill the pipe with TCP traffic, UDP will be dead aswell. Protocols don't m

RE: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-10 Thread Kevin Walsh
Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > > I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable > > difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are > > using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-10 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > 1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic > 2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic > If they fill the pipe with TCP traffic, UDP will be dead as well. Protocols don't matter, bandwidth does. -- Michiel van

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-10 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
Joseph wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload rate sinc

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Joseph
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable > difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are > using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload > rate since VoIP calls

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
Darren Wright wrote: --- An ever better way is get some kind of SLA with guaranteed uptime and bandwith, a symetrical link, and do some traffic shaping to ensure that VoIP has priority. Part of the point of VoIP is to save money by collapsing voice and data networks on

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Alex
I am doing traffic shaping with a open source linux firewall http://www.ipcop.org/ and since i have traffic shaping configured my 3 VoIP lines work great. I am not using Asterix yet but I will go to as soon as I have the time to work myself into it. If anybody can tell me where the best info

RE: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Darren Wright
--- An ever better way is get some kind of SLA with guaranteed uptime and bandwith, a symetrical link, and do some traffic shaping to ensure that VoIP has priority. Part of the point of VoIP is to save money by collapsing voice and data networks onto one (presumably robu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
Dave Redmore wrote: Hello All, Wondering what sort of real world mileage people are getting out of different internet connecions - i.e. different DSL connection speeds, cable modems, etc... Is it reasonable to hope to carry 10 - 15 concurrent calls on a 768K DSL? I'm not talking about theo

[Asterisk-Users] call "load balancing"

2005-08-09 Thread Dave Redmore
Hello All, Wondering what sort of real world mileage people are getting out of different internet connecions - i.e. different DSL connection speeds, cable modems, etc... Is it reasonable to hope to carry 10 - 15 concurrent calls on a 768K DSL? I'm not talking about theoretical BW or looking