-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Weinberger
Sent: 29 July 2008 15:26
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2008 18
Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2008 18:54 schrieb Al Baker:
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of
modern software development. CISCO software is developed in a CMM
environment.
It has a formal test methodology and uses Automated Testing on EACH new
release to ensure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Comments inline
Al lists wrote:
| I agree, No manager gets fired even if a Cisco Call Manager goes south.
| that's not the case with Asterisk.
| With limited experience that i have with both, i hit more bugs using
| Asterisk than a CCM, but this is
Quote
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern
software development.
CISCO software is developed in a CMM
Al Baker a écrit :
Quote
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern
software development.
CISCO software is
Al Baker wrote:
Quote
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern
software development.
CISCO software
Al Baker wrote:
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern
software development.
CISCO software is
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Quote
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack
Do say no more, thank you Alex i think a majority of users here think the
same, i suspect that Alan Baker is the kind of person who defends his
position no matter what it takes, and facts dont change that much, look at
other topic at this list here 'Cisco Call Manager to Asterisk conversion'
Same
Patrick wrote:
Al Baker wrote:
Quote
Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM
and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not
worse.
This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern
software development.
.
- Original Message -
From: Benoit Plessis
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:10:50 +0200
voip crazy a écrit :
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:59:24 -0400
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:52 AM, voip crazy wrote:
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement
T G wrote:
I'm a CCIE and CCVP. I have worked in the Cisco TSBU on both CCM and
Telepresence systems I have two IP patents for the VoiP Lite protocols
and have been designing and building OSS IPBXs for companies including
Google going back to 2001.
I'm not mentioning any of that to be
T G wrote:
I'm a CCIE and CCVP. I have worked in the Cisco TSBU on both CCM and
Telepresence systems I have two IP patents for the VoiP Lite protocols
and have been designing and building OSS IPBXs for companies including
Google going back to 2001.
I'm not mentioning any of that to be
-
From: Benoit Plessis
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:10:50 +0200
voip crazy a écrit :
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We
I agree, No manager gets fired even if a Cisco Call Manager goes south.
that's not the case with Asterisk.
With limited experience that i have with both, i hit more bugs using
Asterisk than a CCM, but this is not relevant to your final answer.
If you can afford CCM, and you can live with less
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the
Cisco PBX.
I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco Unity)
Has asterisk all the functionalities to replace a CIsco Unity
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:52 AM, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the
Cisco PBX.
I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco
voip crazy a écrit :
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the
Cisco PBX.
I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco Unity)
Has asterisk all the functionalities to
Hi,
I don't use asterisk since 1.2.x version and never deployed an big project
with Asterisk, so I don't know if currently Asterisk can replace to Cisco
Unity as Voice Mail, but Cisco Unity is not only for voice mail the main
objective is to be part of all Unified Communications infrastructure.
Call me crazy, but why are you so keen on selling them an Asterisk box
when you don't even know if its capable of doing what you want to sell
it for?
thats kinda scray actually.
--
Matt
http://www.mattgwatson.ca
On 7/22/08, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
A client of us, is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Call me crazy, but why are you so keen on selling them an Asterisk box
when you don't even know if its capable of doing what you want to sell
it for?
I won't, i had the same felling ...
thats kinda scray actually.
Yep
At this stage connectivity is great between asterisk -- sipX(3.8) --
Exchange UM
And still i dont see the features needed.
2008/7/22 Benoit Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Call me crazy, but why are you so keen on selling them an Asterisk box
when you don't even know
voip crazy wrote:
Hello all,
A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco
CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the
Cisco PBX.
I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco Unity)
Has asterisk all the functionalities to
Alex Balashov schrieb:
The question is:
1. What are you trying to do?
2. Can Asterisk do it?
3. Can Asterisk do it well?
4. Can Asterisk do it at the scale, volume and scope you're looking for?
The question is NOT:
1. Is Asterisk basically like a free version of CallManager?
:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
Alex Balashov schrieb:
The question is:
1. What are you trying to do?
2. Can Asterisk do it?
3. Can Asterisk do it well?
4. Can Asterisk do it at the scale, volume and scope you're looking for?
The question
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk
It's amazing... the man starts the thread with a simple question: Can
anybody tell him if Asterisk can do the same things that the Cisco Unity
Server can do?, if it can do some better, some the same, and/or some
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Come on. People want simple answers. So:
Can Asterisk duplicate CallManager? [y/n]
*scnr*
I think for questions like this, we should always consider the m
(maybe) option. :)
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
Rob Hillis wrote:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Come on. People want simple answers. So:
Can Asterisk duplicate CallManager? [y/n]
*scnr*
I think for questions like this, we should always consider the m
(maybe) option. :)
Or my preferred approach:
Yes means no and no means yes. Can
29 matches
Mail list logo
