Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Patrick Lists
On 09/14/2012 05:26 AM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote: [snip] Asterisk 1.8.13, Dahdi 2.5.0.1 on Debian Testing (Wheezy), MTNL Mumbai. Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX410 4-port analog card (PCI-Express) Your DAHDI and Asterisk versions are old so for starters I would update everything to the latest

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
On Friday 14 Sep 2012, Patrick Lists wrote: On 09/14/2012 05:26 AM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote: [snip] Asterisk 1.8.13, Dahdi 2.5.0.1 on Debian Testing (Wheezy), MTNL Mumbai. Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX410 4-port analog card (PCI-Express) Your DAHDI and Asterisk versions are old so

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Warren Selby
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) r...@linux-delhi.org wrote: So if there's a good chance that the latest Asterisk and Dahdi packages will give better results in testing or might actually solve the problem, I'll be glad to compile from source. If not, then perhaps it's

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Mitul Limbani
Operator sends callerId after 1st small ring (actually this is not audible since its very small duration ring) post which all the data flows. However, sometimes due to line distrubance this first small ring is missed. Regards, Mitul Limbani, Chief Architech Founder, Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Richard Mudgett
Continuing with the saga of Digium vs MTNL Mumbai, looking for suggestions on handling incoming Caller-ID issues. The card manages to grab a couple of (random) digits of the incoming CID, but they're more or less useless. Is there any way to fix this? Asterisk 1.8.13, Dahdi 2.5.0.1 on

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread A J Stiles
On Friday 14 September 2012, Mitul Limbani wrote: Operator sends callerId after 1st small ring (actually this is not audible since its very small duration ring) post which all the data flows. However, sometimes due to line distrubance this first small ring is missed. Are you sure caller ID

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
On Friday 14 Sep 2012, Richard Mudgett wrote: Continuing with the saga of Digium vs MTNL Mumbai, looking for suggestions on handling incoming Caller-ID issues. The card manages to grab a couple of (random) digits of the incoming CID, but they're more or less useless. Is there any way

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-14 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
On Friday 14 Sep 2012, Richard Mudgett wrote: Continuing with the saga of Digium vs MTNL Mumbai, looking for suggestions on handling incoming Caller-ID issues. The card manages to grab a couple of (random) digits of the incoming CID, but they're more or less useless. Is there any way

[asterisk-users] Digium AEX410, MTNL Mumbai Caller-ID problems

2012-09-13 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
Hi, Continuing with the saga of Digium vs MTNL Mumbai, looking for suggestions on handling incoming Caller-ID issues. The card manages to grab a couple of (random) digits of the incoming CID, but they're more or less useless. Is there any way to fix this? Asterisk 1.8.13, Dahdi 2.5.0.1 on

[asterisk-users] Digium AEX410

2008-05-11 Thread Matt Watson
Poking around the zaptel SVN earlier today i see support was added for an AEX410 card recently... I'm going to go out on a limb and assume this is the PCI-Express version of the TDM410? Any hints on a general availability date? -- Matt ___ --