Benny Amorsen wrote:
PvK == Philipp von Klitzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PvK Some of the bigger MFC printer/copy/fax combo devices by Brother
PvK (and maybe also other vendors?) provide a fax-via-smtp feature
PvK and can built fax networks that way.
As far as I can tell, the
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:56:46AM +0200, John Hughes wrote:
And why on earth don't all the HP MFC's that have Ethernet and or
Wireless and a Fax modem also have T.38 built in? I've got 2 of the damn
things and the fax capability is useless to me.
For the same reason that fax modems in
JH == John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JH And why on earth don't all the HP MFC's that have Ethernet and or
JH Wireless and a Fax modem also have T.38 built in? I've got 2 of
JH the damn things and the fax capability is useless to me.
T.38 would require actual code. T.37 is already
Olivier wrote:
I was told yesterday (by Cantata guy) that T.38 demands a good level
of QoS.
That surprised me a lot as I thought the whole purpose of T.38 was to
avoid SIP and ToIP latency.
T.37 is the answer to reliability, but most people don't want to use it
for totally stupid reasons.
Hello all,
I'd like to thank everyone's input which I'll sumarize and comment on
bellow.
As in all complex solutions, there are no quick answers and no 100%
correct solutions. There are trade-offs to be made among
very different possiblities... Of course, the purpose of my original
PvK == Philipp von Klitzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PvK Some of the bigger MFC printer/copy/fax combo devices by Brother
PvK (and maybe also other vendors?) provide a fax-via-smtp feature
PvK and can built fax networks that way.
As far as I can tell, the Brother boxes require the user to
John,
For incoming fax numbers, did you port existing numbers or did you get new
numbers from bandwidth.com ?
If the later, what if you switch for another provider ?
Would you then be able to port the given number to your new provider ?
Regards
___
On 10/10/07, Ex Vito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I'm evaluating a private telephony scenario of about 20
locations - 300 phones, 50 FAX machines.
More than 1 PRI?
All other locations, small by themselves, would get SIP
phones managed by asterisk, since there is good IP
Olivier wrote:
2007/10/12, Jonn Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would you then be able to port the given number to your new
provider ?
Yes, if you are in the US. Number port ability is one thing that ALL
VIOP providers had to provide.
Here too
I was told yesterday (by Cantata guy) that T.38 demands a good level of QoS.
That surprised me a lot as I thought the whole purpose of T.38 was to avoid
SIP and ToIP latency.
Another editor (Interstar) told me T.38 passthrough doesn't work.
As devil lies in details and I couldn't get any, I'm
2007/10/12, Jonn Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would you then be able to port the given number to your new provider ?
Yes, if you are in the US. Number port ability is one thing that ALL
VIOP providers had to provide.
Here too (France), number portability is mandatory but in facts, I couldn't
Olivier wrote:
John,
For incoming fax numbers, did you port existing numbers or did you get
new numbers from bandwidth.com http://bandwidth.com ?
Both, we ported numbers and got new one's.
If the later, what if you switch for another provider ?
I did alot of research before we went with
Hi!
2. On the remaining locations we have a problem
which I have been studying and trying to address...
Faxing over IP.
There might be yet another option for you to consider:
Some of the bigger MFC printer/copy/fax combo devices by Brother (and
maybe also other vendors?)
Ex Vito wrote:
2. On the remaining locations we have a problem
which I have been studying and trying to address...
Faxing over IP.
Could the 'remote' locations make do without a fax machine proper? We
have sheet-fed pdf scanners here, drop the document in and hit the
Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
Ex Vito wrote:
2. On the remaining locations we have a problem
which I have been studying and trying to address...
Faxing over IP.
Could the 'remote' locations make do without a fax machine proper? We
have sheet-fed pdf
Hi list,
I'm evaluating a private telephony scenario of about 20
locations - 300 phones, 50 FAX machines.
Initial overview points to the installation of asterisk at three
locations connected to the PSTN via ISDN PRI.
All other locations, small by themselves, would get SIP
phones
16 matches
Mail list logo
