List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
[park-dial]
; app_park adds a priority 1 for us, but due to Asterisk oddities, we
still need this Noop
exten => _.,1,Noop
exten => _.,n,Goto(corporate,3500,1)
exten => h,1,Noop
Mike wrote:
> That would hel
ember 15, 2008 16:16
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
>
>
>
> Terry Wilson wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Mike wrote:
>>
>>> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to d
r" Wieling
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 16:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
Terry Wilson wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do w
Terry Wilson wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do what I want short of
>> playing with the underlying code, correct?
>
> Yes. I'm working on an issue right now related to parking and noticed
> that Asterisk completely lies with the
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Mike wrote:
> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do what I want short of
> playing with the underlying code, correct?
Yes. I'm working on an issue right now related to parking an
3. HangUp()
[pbx_config]
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David fire
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:17 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Mike wrote:
> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do what I want short of
> playing with the underlying code, correct?
Yes. I'm working on an issue right now related to parking and noticed
that Asterisk completely lies with the verbose statement saying that
n...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike
> *Sent:* Monday, December 15, 2008 7:05 AM
>
> *To:* 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
>
>
>
>
- Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do what I want short of playing with
the underlying code, correct?
Mike
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.co
risk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
After some research, it seems that asterisk builds a dynamic context called
[park-dial] and puts a callback for the parker into line 1, so this would
have to be a patch/workaround.
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:40 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
Danny,
I've been starring at features.conf since yesterday AM, and I do realize
there is an example that looks
ling List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
You should try these steps
1. core show application park from the CLI interface
2. look at features.conf
3. one of these should offer the hint you seek
_
From:
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:46 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
I`m having (a lot of) trouble changing the call parking timeout behavior.
This is my SIP context.
[internal-local-only-hamel]
I`m having (a lot of) trouble changing the call parking timeout behavior.
This is my SIP contextÂ…
[internal-local-only-hamel]
exten => s,1,Hangup
include => parkedcalls
What I am trying to accomppish is a quick test where I park a call, wait 45
seconds, and it hangs up.
Here is my
14 matches
Mail list logo
