On 11/21/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >> just keep in mind that in
> >> my opinion the 1.4 tree did not become usable until 1.4.18 when most
> >> of the major bugs were finally fixed.
>
>
> The lon
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> just keep in mind that in
>> my opinion the 1.4 tree did not become usable until 1.4.18 when most
>> of the major bugs were finally fixed.
The longer you drag out the adoption curve, the longer it will take for
1.6 to
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/20/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:25:54AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
>> >> 2008/11/17 Philipp Kemp
On 11/21/08, Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008 09:42:12 Matt Florell wrote:
> > On 11/20/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > You also have
> > > people like Matt Florell who have continued to add functionality to
> > > 1.2 but since Digium
On Friday 21 November 2008 09:42:12 Matt Florell wrote:
> On 11/20/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You also have
> > people like Matt Florell who have continued to add functionality to
> > 1.2 but since Digium won't take them, or the dev doesn't want to sign
> > over their first
On 11/20/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:25:54AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> >> 2008/11/17 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> > Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> >> > > On Thu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:25:54AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
>> 2008/11/17 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
>> > > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> > >> Is there
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:25:54AM +0100, Olivier wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > >> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
> > >> Asterisk 1.
2008/11/17 Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
> >> Asterisk 1.4?
> >
> > There is no statement, because we haven't even discussed w
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:46:10PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
> >> Asterisk 1.4?
> >
> > There is no statement, because we haven'
On Monday 17 November 2008 07:03:52 pm Atis Lezdins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Tilghman Lesher
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 17 November 2008 04:50:43 pm Anthony Francis wrote:
> >> How do you go about determining this has happened?
> >>
> >> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Tilghman Lesher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2008 04:50:43 pm Anthony Francis wrote:
>> How do you go about determining this has happened?
>>
>> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>> > Similarly, we will probably end-of-life 1.4 when a majority of users m
Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> On Monday 17 November 2008 12:46:10 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
>> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> >> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
>> >> Asterisk 1.4?
>> >
>> > There is no
On Monday 17 November 2008 04:50:43 pm Anthony Francis wrote:
> How do you go about determining this has happened?
>
> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > Similarly, we will probably end-of-life 1.4 when a majority of users make
> > the jump to 1.6.
There are various measures, such as the questions people
How do you go about determining this has happened?
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> Similarly, we will probably end-of-life 1.4 when a majority of users make the
> jump to 1.6.
--
Thank you and have any kind of day you want,
Anthony Francis
Rockynet VOIP
On Monday 17 November 2008 12:46:10 pm Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
> >> Asterisk 1.4?
> >
> > There is no statement, because we haven't ev
Tilghman Lesher schrieb:
> On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
>> Asterisk 1.4?
>
> There is no statement, because we haven't even discussed when the EOL for
> 1.4 will be reached. Certainly that mean
On Thursday 13 November 2008 08:16:42 Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
> Asterisk 1.4?
There is no statement, because we haven't even discussed when the EOL for
1.4 will be reached. Certainly that means it won't happen for at least the
Hi!
Is there somewhere a statement from Digium how long they will support
Asterisk 1.4?
thanks
klaus
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
19 matches
Mail list logo
