2008/1/9, Johansson Olle E [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
9 jan 2008 kl. 02.48 skrev Raj Jain:
This issue of phone vendors not supporting OPTIONS according to RFC
3261
often comes up on this list. Like Kevin Fleming said, an OPTIONS
request is
supposed to be responded in the same way as an
2008/1/10, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To get a polite go to hell ! in return ? ;-)
I think the vendors will be nicer than that.
You're right.
Asterisk has a good bit
of the VoIP PBX market.
Asking all of them for guidance (how do you plan to
Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As using OPTIONS requests main benefit is to non-phone specific, what
shall we do when most vendors do not comply with RFC ?
Write polite letters to the vendors?
/Benny
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
2008/1/9, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As using OPTIONS requests main benefit is to non-phone specific, what
shall we do when most vendors do not comply with RFC ?
Write polite letters to the vendors?
To get a polite go to hell ! in return ? ;-)
Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To get a polite go to hell ! in return ? ;-)
I think the vendors will be nicer than that. Asterisk has a good bit
of the VoIP PBX market.
/Benny
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
That's going to be pretty phone-specific. How about asking your phone
supplier to fix their phone so that it responds to OPTIONS correctly?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: 08 January 2008 12:50
2008/1/8, Steve Langstaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's going to be pretty phone-specific. How about asking your phone
supplier to fix their phone so that it responds to OPTIONS correctly?
Yes, you're right but RFC3261 doesn't specify such 302 replies.
So I'm very pessimistic about my phone
This issue of phone vendors not supporting OPTIONS according to RFC 3261
often comes up on this list. Like Kevin Fleming said, an OPTIONS request is
supposed to be responded in the same way as an INVITE. Almost all SIP phone
vendors have construed OPTIONS as some kind of a keep-alive request,
As using OPTIONS requests main benefit is to non-phone specific, what shall
we do when most vendors do not comply with RFC ?
2008/1/9, Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This issue of phone vendors not supporting OPTIONS according to RFC 3261
often comes up on this list. Like Kevin Fleming said, an
9 jan 2008 kl. 02.48 skrev Raj Jain:
This issue of phone vendors not supporting OPTIONS according to RFC
3261
often comes up on this list. Like Kevin Fleming said, an OPTIONS
request is
supposed to be responded in the same way as an INVITE. Almost all
SIP phone
vendors have
10 matches
Mail list logo