Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-14 Thread James Cloos
If they will do atm over oc-n, perhaps that would work better. Ie, a perm virt circ for SS7 and as-needed vc's for ulaw. Atm oc-n cards with linux sw support are widely available, according to goog. libss7 and and ast *might* need a bit of patching to work with it, but it shoudn't take too

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-14 Thread Nick Khamis
Hello James, thank you so much for your response! On 6/14/13, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: If they will do atm over oc-n, perhaps that would work better. Yes they will do atm over oc-n only not sure if they will ring or spur it... Ie, a perm virt circ for SS7 and as-needed vc's for

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Nick Khamis
Hello Brian, Thank you so much On 6/12/13, Brian LaVallee b.laval...@globaltank.jp wrote: Hi Nick, Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that handles multiple MUX steps together. The

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Nick Khamis
On 6/12/13, Don Kelly d...@donkelly.biz wrote: Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense? --Don Hello Don, what will be coming out of the network discussed above would be SIP. Kind Regards, Nick. -- _ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Nick Khamis
Correction: I think VT1.5s mappings are more flexible? Sorry! N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Eric Wieling
: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3 On 6/12/13, Don Kelly d...@donkelly.biz wrote: Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense? --Don Hello Don, what will be coming out of the network discussed above would be SIP. Kind Regards, Nick

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Nick Khamis
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3 Hello Eric, Thank you so much for your response. Is this an ISUP-IP interconnect (i.e., SS7IP), or are you referring to the traditional DID based VoIP. In either case, do

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Eric Wieling
, June 13, 2013 10:29 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3 On 6/13/13, Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote: Verizon (NE ILEC) has SIP handoff. -Original Message- From: asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-13 Thread Nick Khamis
Hello Eric, Thank your for your reponse. We are discussing interconnects at a different level. We are more interested in SS7 or ISUP-IP SS7IP type interconnects. There are many people that offer DIDs channels etc. over the internet. Including us. N. --

[asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-12 Thread Brian LaVallee
Hi Nick, Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that handles multiple MUX steps together. VT1.5 is just a raw OC-n channel containing a single DS1. An M13 device converts between DS3 and DS1. A

Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5 vs DS3

2013-06-12 Thread Don Kelly
Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense? --Don Hi Nick, Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that handles multiple MUX steps together. VT1.5 is just a raw OC-n channel containing