[asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Doug Lytle
I've replaced the phone system and it still didn't make any difference with the phones bouncing. I've got a capture of a conversation between one of the phones and the phone system. It would appear that when the drop out occurs, the phone does not respond. After several attempts, the phone

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Alexander Lopez
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture I've replaced the phone system and it still didn't make any difference with the phones bouncing. I've got a capture of a conversation between one of the phones and the phone system. It would appear

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Mik Cheez
Something is certainly wrong here. Can you check the netmask? I assume you're just using a full class C, which would make the netmask 255.255.255.0. Also, should I assume the trace is being done on the Asterisk machine? Try running a trace on all interfaces for port 5060: ]# tethereal -i

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Doug Lytle
Mik Cheez wrote: Something is certainly wrong here. Can you check the netmask? I assume you're just using a full class C, which would make the netmask That would be correct. 255.255.255.0. Also, should I assume the trace is being done on the Asterisk machine? Yes Try running

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Doug Lytle
Alexander Lopez wrote: Is it possible that the phones loaded a new Firmware or that the configuration file has changed? No, they are the older IP300 and IP500s. They're currently running 2.1.2.0078. I was going to move them up to the 2.2.0, but the firmware won't work on these older

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Alexander Lopez
: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture Alexander Lopez wrote: Is it possible that the phones loaded a new Firmware or that the configuration file has changed? No, they are the older IP300 and IP500s. They're currently running 2.1.2.0078. I was going to move them up

Re: [asterisk-users] More fun but with Wireshark capture

2008-05-22 Thread Doug Lytle
Doug Lytle wrote: Mik Cheez wrote: Something is certainly wrong here. Can you check the netmask? I assume you're just using a full class C, which would make the netmask We may have tracked it down. We started looking at the DNS issues that Alexander mentioned and saw that the