Re: [asterisk-users] MusicOnHold Files

2007-01-08 Thread Matt Riddell (NZ)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yuan LIU wrote: One item in my todo list is to make better sound quality whenever end point supports it. Wide-band codec's can already produce better sound than toll. So why do we still need to convert to 8 bit? Should be 16 bit, 8Khz, not 8

[asterisk-users] MusicOnHold Files

2007-01-04 Thread Forrest Beck
I was just wondering what you all are doing for music on hold files for best quality. I am not much of an expert on sound rates, bits, stereo, mono, tracks, and all that jazz. Currently I am taking music from a CD (our campus jazz band has recorded a CD), converting to WAV, using Audacity to

Re: [asterisk-users] MusicOnHold Files

2007-01-04 Thread Carla Schroder
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:01, Forrest Beck wrote: I was just wondering what you all are doing for music on hold files for best quality. I am not much of an expert on sound rates, bits, stereo, mono, tracks, and all that jazz. Currently I am taking music from a CD (our campus jazz band

Re: [asterisk-users] MusicOnHold Files

2007-01-04 Thread Trevor Peirce
Carla Schroder wrote: On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:01, Forrest Beck wrote: [snip] Currently I am taking music from a CD (our campus jazz band has recorded a CD), converting to WAV, using Audacity to convert the stereo tracks into mono, drop the gain to -15db, then I use sox to convert to

Re: [asterisk-users] MusicOnHold Files

2007-01-04 Thread Yuan LIU
From: Carla Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:01, Forrest Beck wrote: I was just wondering what you all are doing for music on hold files for best quality. I am not much of an expert on sound rates, bits, stereo, mono, tracks, and all that jazz. Currently I am taking