I have a PRI E1 link between Asterisk 1.4.24 and Alcatel-Lucent OmniPCX
Enterprise R9.0.
As EuroISDN it works fine.
However, I need to move to QSIG because of a firmware upgrade on the Alcatel
PBX which doesn't support EuroISDN (please don't ask why).
Besides, I've read somewhere that 2 B
On my EuroISDN PRI link, a pri debug on the same type of call yields the
messages below. What could I try to do to see why the QSIG pri link doesn't
work (times out)?
Thanks
Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1065/0x429) (Originator)
Message type: SETUP (5)
[04 03 80 90 a3]
Bearer Capability
I have a user who's system crashes on pri hangup request. Tried 1.4.19.1 and
1.4.20 as well as the latest libpri no change
Progress is as follows..
Supervisory frame:
SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0
TEI: 000EA: 1
Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ]
N(R): 025 P/F: 1
0 bytes
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:52 PM, James Finstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user who's system crashes on pri hangup request. Tried 1.4.19.1 and
1.4.20 as well as the latest libpri no change
Progress is as follows..
Supervisory frame:
SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0
TEI: 000
IAX2 wasjust the example for this output originating channel makes no
difference. I can reproduce it zap to zap, sip to zap or iax2 to zap
James Finstrom
Rhino Equipment Corp.
All Rhino products are made in America, 100% Money Back Guarantee,
and have a 5 Year warranty. Quality and Toughness
On 9/12/06, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested to understand why I many messages like:
WARNING[21314] chan_zap.c: Ring requested on channel 0/1 already in use
on span 1. Hanging up owner
How can a channel be already in use??? That means the channel is
busy...if it is
Hi Steve,
I agree with you..telco knows better!
If telco sends a ring on channel X and asterisk has already used it,
couldn't asterisk shift that call on another channel Y or it is
obliged to answer on channel X?
In other words, if asterisk get a ring on channel 3 and channel 3 is in
use,
On 9/13/06, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steve,
I agree with you..telco knows better!
If telco sends a ring on channel X and asterisk has already used it,
couldn't asterisk shift that call on another channel Y or it is
obliged to answer on channel X?
The telco is in
Problema solved!
Just put resetinterval=never inside zapata.conf
Giorgio Incantalupo
Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:
Hi,
I installed an Asterisk box with a sangoma A102 PRI card. Sometimes
Asterisk drops calls...there is nothing inside logs but these warnings:
Sep 11 15:00:18 WARNING[3503]
For the curious, can anyone tell me how this flag fixes the issue? - I
have seen the error before, but always assumed it was related to hung
channels.
Thanks,
Steve
On 9/12/06, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problema solved!
Just put resetinterval=never inside zapata.conf
Steve Davies wrote:
For the curious, can anyone tell me how this flag fixes the issue? - I
have seen the error before, but always assumed it was related to hung
channels.
Thanks,
Steve
On 9/12/06, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problema solved!
Just put resetinterval=never
On 9/12/06, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Davies wrote:
For the curious, can anyone tell me how this flag fixes the issue? - I
have seen the error before, but always assumed it was related to hung
channels.
Thanks,
Steve
On 9/12/06, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Davies wrote:
On 9/12/06, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Davies wrote:
For the curious, can anyone tell me how this flag fixes the issue? - I
have seen the error before, but always assumed it was related to hung
channels.
Thanks,
Steve
On 9/12/06, Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi,
thanks to all
I solved the calls dropped problem, it was resetinterval parameter in
zapata.now asterisk does not drop calls anymore.
I do not get the message:
WARNING[3503] chan_zap.c: Got restart ack on channel 0/6 span 1 with owner
anymore...but I get all the others.
I'm interested
Hi,
I installed an Asterisk box with a sangoma A102 PRI card. Sometimes Asterisk
drops calls...there is nothing inside logs but these warnings:
Sep 11 15:00:18 WARNING[3503] chan_zap.c: Ring requested on channel 0/6 already
in use on span 1. Hanging up owner.
Sep 11 15:00:22 WARNING[3503]
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julian Varanini
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006
6:35 PM
To: Julian Varanini
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] PRI
and Asterisk
Hi Everyone
Any opinions on this?
Thanks
Julian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Everyone
Any opinions on this?
Thanks
Julian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comDate: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:29:57 +Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI and Asterisk
Hi All,I am planning to order a PRI and would like to know your opinions on a devices like the Redfone
]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:29:57 +
Subject: [asterisk-users] PRI and Asterisk
Hi All,
I am planning to order a PRI and would like to know your
opinions on a devices like the Redfone redbridge. Basically
Hi All,
I am planning to order a PRI and would like to know your opinions on a devices like the Redfone redbridge. Basically any PRI to Asterisk interface that has worked well for you.
Thanks,
Julian
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
What country are you in?
That can make _quite_ a difference.
PaulH
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 01:29 +, Julian Varanini wrote:
Hi All,
I am planning to order a PRI and would like to know your
opinions on a devices like the Redfone redbridge.
U.S.
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI and Asterisk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:35:04 +1000
What country are you in?
That can make _quite_ a difference.
PaulH
On Tue, 2006-07
21 matches
Mail list logo
