Re: [asterisk-users] Question about null routing calls to DIDs we don't handle

2011-06-03 Thread Jesse Thompson
(reposted with correct subject line, I think messing up the subject line last time prevented my question from being read. Cheers :) On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jesse Thompson jes...@gmail.com wrote: Letting a carrier use you as a carrier seems like quite a bad idea generally.. I think I

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about null routing calls to DIDs we don't handle

2011-06-03 Thread Warren Selby
Why not setup a default catch-all route that goes to either your main line (to drive sales) or a pre-recorded message (the number you dialed is disconnected...etc), and then setup more specific pattern matches for assigned numbers? I've done this before for clients that have large blocks of

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about null routing calls to DIDs we don't handle

2011-06-02 Thread Steven Howes
On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:50, Jesse Thompson wrote: We are managing an Asterisk installation for residential VOIP service, and we are having a problem where all inbound calls to DIDs which are assigned to us by our wholesaler but not yet assigned to a downstream customer get caught in a routing

[asterisk-users] Question about null routing calls to DIDs we don't handle

2011-06-01 Thread Jesse Thompson
Hello, this is Jesse with Webformix. We are managing an Asterisk installation for residential VOIP service, and we are having a problem where all inbound calls to DIDs which are assigned to us by our wholesaler but not yet assigned to a downstream customer get caught in a routing loop. ** For