Don't over think this, guys. Again, the point of having a WIKI is to
allow for customization. A landing page for Asterisk documentation
within voip-info.org is all you need, not a whole new source of
documentation.
Jai Rangi wrote:
> **
> I understand. As someone else already mentione
**
I understand. As someone else already mentioned, Voip-Info.org is for more
than just Asterisk. Perhaps if we created a single source that was just for
Asterisk...where everyone could contribute towards making the documentation
better. I would be very interested in helping sponsoring such
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 12:35:15 Wilton Helm wrote:
> >It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained
> >on voip-info.org
>
> My own experience is that it covers a very broad spectrum (far broader than
> Asterisk) and in a rather terse manner. I have spent an hour or two
Jared Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:13 -0700, Robert Broyles wrote:
I'm still pretty new to the mailing lists myself. I don't consider
myself a novice Asterisk user, but one of my biggest 'complaints' is
the lack of a well documented FAQ or Manual for Asterisk.
riginal Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ira
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 1:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:13 -0700, Robert Broyles wrote:
> I'm still pretty new to the mailing lists myself. I don't consider
> myself a novice Asterisk user, but one of my biggest 'complaints' is
> the lack of a well documented FAQ or Manual for Asterisk.
Asterisk is truly an open-source communi
Ira wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
>
>> People are always going to ask stupid questions.
>>
>
> For me it's not so much the stupid questions as the expectations that
> we're here to solve their problems according to their needs. If that
> continues to happen and the noise leve
At 09:30 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
>People are always going to ask stupid questions.
For me it's not so much the stupid questions as the expectations that
we're here to solve their problems according to their needs. If that
continues to happen and the noise level gets high enough those that
have
If you find something on a WIKI that is outdated, guess what you have an
opportunity to do . . .
Noah Miller wrote:
>> It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained
>> on voip-info.org
>
> Hmm. Dangerous statement. There are many things on the WIKI that are
> quite ou
>It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained
>on voip-info.org
My own experience is that it covers a very broad spectrum (far broader than
Asterisk) and in a rather terse manner. I have spent an hour or two at a time
pouring over a topic there and come away little m
> It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained
> on voip-info.org
Hmm. Dangerous statement. There are many things on the WIKI that are
quite outdated, and a great many other things that aren't there at
all.
> People don't ask stupid questions because of a lack of a FA
I wouldn't say that voip-info.org has everything that a person would
want to know.
This is especially true of any recent changes to dialplan applications
(and their available options)
Voip-info.org is a great place to start, and often you will find an
answer there. But not always.
People are
It seems to me that everything one may want to know would be contained
on voip-info.org
People don't ask stupid questions because of a lack of a FAQ to read,
they ask stupid questions because they're too lazy do to the footwork.
Robert Broyles wrote:
>
>> I think we'd be better off posting a r
I think we'd be better off posting a regular FAQ, perhaps weekly, with some of
these suggestions, as well as providing a link to that FAQ from the mailing
list signup page, along with a STRONG suggestion to peruse the FAQ first.
I agree with this 100%
I'm still pretty new to the mailing lis
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:57:54 Steve Edwards wrote:
> The -user and -dev mailing lists are a valuable resource -- when they are
> not cluttered by posts unrelated to the "charter" of the lists.
>
> In my limited memory, this last weekend represents a new low in the
> "relevant subject to noise
f Steve Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
Subject: [asterisk-users] RFC -- Improving the quality of the mailing lists
The -user and -dev mailing lists are a valuable resource -- when they are
not cluttered by posts unrelated to the "charter&
The -user and -dev mailing lists are a valuable resource -- when they are
not cluttered by posts unrelated to the "charter" of the lists.
In my limited memory, this last weekend represents a new low in the
"relevant subject to noise ratio."
Replying to requests with meaningless, misleading, or
17 matches
Mail list logo
