[asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Davies wrote: I have a problem understanding which 'h' (hangup) extension is used in which case - It seems to vary depending on channel type. It doesn't. It depends on which side of the call hangs up.

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Andrea Spadaccini
Ciao Tony, I believe that for any channel that is executing in the dialplan, when it is hung up, either directly or due to its peer hanging up, it will execute the 'h' extension, if any, in whatever is its current context. My experience confirms your statements. IMHO Asterisk should behave

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 7:02 am, Andrea Spadaccini wrote: This would surely be more intuitive and would require less dialplan programming when there are more than one point where one might get an hangup and hangup conditions must be handled (i.e. Vicidial/Astguiclient). So then just do

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Andrea Spadaccini
Ciao Andrew, On Tuesday 06 February 2007 7:02 am, Andrea Spadaccini wrote: This would surely be more intuitive and would require less dialplan programming when there are more than one point where one might get an hangup and hangup conditions must be handled (i.e. Vicidial/Astguiclient).

[asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007 7:02 am, Andrea Spadaccini wrote: This would surely be more intuitive and would require less dialplan programming when there are more than one point where one might get an hangup and hangup

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Tony Mountifield wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Davies wrote: I have a problem understanding which 'h' (hangup) extension is used in which case - It seems to vary depending on channel type. It doesn't. It depends on which side of

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 11:17 am, Tony Mountifield wrote: I have never needed explicitly to Goto the 'h' extension. If I'm in a normal context and a Dial fails, if I then fall off the bottom of the extension, it goes to my h extension anyway. I don't think I have to, but I explicitly do

[asterisk-users] Re: 'h' extension and which one applies?

2007-02-06 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tony Mountifield wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Davies wrote: I have a problem understanding which 'h' (hangup) extension is used in which case -