Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-16 Thread voiplist
Trixbox is only used as the client to simulate what we already saw happening with a customer. I don't think the fact that we used a Trixbox on the client side has anything to do with the problem on the server side which is not using Trixbox. The on the server side Asterisk only sees the Trixbox

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-16 Thread Tim Panton
On 16 Jul 2006, at 19:00, voiplist wrote: Trixbox is only used as the client to simulate what we already saw happening with a customer. I don't think the fact that we used a Trixbox on the client side has anything to do with the problem on the server side which is not using Trixbox. The on

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-16 Thread voiplist
Actually, at this point this info was more for the community as a whole. We don't need to fix this now because the account code is right and that's what is important. On 7/16/06, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16 Jul 2006, at 19:00, voiplist wrote: Trixbox is only used as the

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-15 Thread voiplist
After further testing, here is what we found.. The account code was actually right after all, what made us think it was incorrect was the fact that * was reporting the wrong channel for the call. For example we may have a call from iaxuser1 which comes in with the correct account code but it

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-15 Thread Tim Panton
On 15 Jul 2006, at 17:24, voiplist wrote: After further testing, here is what we found.. The account code was actually right after all, what made us think it was incorrect was the fact that * was reporting the wrong channel for the call. Test 2: We turned off the softphones mentioned

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-15 Thread voiplist
On 7/15/06, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15 Jul 2006, at 17:24, voiplist wrote: After further testing, here is what we found.. The account code was actually right after all, what made us think it was incorrect was the fact that * was reporting the wrong channel for the call.

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-15 Thread Tim Panton
On 15 Jul 2006, at 19:26, voiplist wrote: On 7/15/06, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15 Jul 2006, at 17:24, voiplist wrote: After further testing, here is what we found.. The account code was actually right after all, what made us think it was incorrect was the fact that * was

[asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-14 Thread voiplist
Anyone have any thoughts on this? On 7/13/06, voiplist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a situation where the wrong account code is being passed from Asterisk to our AGI and then on into the accountcode field in the CDR. Here is the situation, best I can explain it.. We have 3 user records in

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-14 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Sounds to me that the incoming call is providing the wrong userid/password. voiplist wrote: Anyone have any thoughts on this? On 7/13/06, voiplist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a situation where the wrong account code is being passed from Asterisk to our AGI and then on into the

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-14 Thread voiplist
I wish it were that simple.. We see the username coming in, it's in the channel etc.. We see the call come into one account and we see * set an account code for another account.. Really.. It seems that it has something to do with the fact that accounts registering from the same IP get mixed

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Wrong account code from iax_buddies

2006-07-14 Thread Matt Riddell (NZ)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 voiplist wrote: I wish it were that simple.. We see the username coming in, it's in the channel etc.. We see the call come into one account and we see * set an account code for another account.. Really.. It seems that it has something to do