Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendation for extension mapping on inbound T1 line

2012-10-12 Thread Mitch Claborn
The "s" extension did not catch the incoming call. It was only when I added a specific 366 or the _. wildcard that I was able to capture the incoming call. Mitch On 10/12/2012 10:18 AM, A J Stiles wrote: If (and only if) all the extensions you are using in all your contexts are numeric, t

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendation for extension mapping on inbound T1 line

2012-10-12 Thread A J Stiles
On Friday 12 October 2012, Mitch Claborn wrote: > Converting this customer from a MiTel system to asterisk. Discovered > that the inbound calls from the T1 are going to extension 366. (This > was mapped in the MiTel for some arcane purpose.) The dial plan I am > currently using is shown below. W

Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendation for extension mapping on inbound T1 line

2012-10-12 Thread Christopher Harrington
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Mitch Claborn wrote: > Converting this customer from a MiTel system to asterisk. Discovered that > the inbound calls from the T1 are going to extension 366. (This was mapped > in the MiTel for some arcane purpose.) The dial plan I am currently using > is shown be

[asterisk-users] Recommendation for extension mapping on inbound T1 line

2012-10-12 Thread Mitch Claborn
Converting this customer from a MiTel system to asterisk. Discovered that the inbound calls from the T1 are going to extension 366. (This was mapped in the MiTel for some arcane purpose.) The dial plan I am currently using is shown below. When loading the dial plan, I get this warning: WA