Right now I have an Asterisk 1.4.18ish server and a Wildcard POTS
interface. As it is now, when the zap line gets a call, Asterisk
answers it and waits for the analog CID to be presented, then rings the
SIP phones with the call and the CID. There's a significant latency
involved in doing this.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now I have an Asterisk 1.4.18ish server and a Wildcard POTS
interface. As it is now, when the zap line gets a call, Asterisk
answers it and waits for the analog CID to be presented, then rings the
SIP phones with
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
until a couple of rings. Why not have that option in Asterisk?
Intersting idea... However, I live in a country
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 15:57 +0100, Gordon Henderson wrote:
Intersting idea... However, I live in a country where on a regular
landline with caller ID, the caller ID is displayed before the phone
rings, so make sure it's an option and not hard-wired...
Well, I think your situation makes the
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
until a couple of rings. Why not have
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if the SIP lines can start ringing as soon as the zap line
gets a call and when the zap line finally gets the CID, that is passed
down to the already ringing SIP phones.
This is actually an interesting
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID info
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:55 AM, John Novack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Steve Totaro wrote:
That brings up a question though, on a regular landline with caller ID
the phone rings right away, it just doesn't display caller ID
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if the SIP lines can start ringing as soon as the zap line
gets a call and when the zap line finally gets the CID, that is passed
down to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if the SIP lines can start ringing as soon as the zap line
gets a
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if the SIP lines can start
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Brent Davidson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:30 -0500, Brent Davidson wrote:
On the subject of CallerID and ringing, I'm not sure if it's like this
everywhere in the US, but where I live in Texas, our caller ID signal
is sent between the first and second rings.
It's like that here in Canada too.
If the phone is
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:30 -0500, Brent Davidson wrote:
On the subject of CallerID and ringing, I'm not sure if it's like this
everywhere in the US, but where I live in Texas, our caller ID signal
is sent between the
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
If you ever have problems with a call dropping after 30 seconds,
Answer() is usually the cause.
Interesting. I can't say that I've ever had that problem.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
If you ever have problems with a call dropping after 30 seconds,
Answer() is usually the cause.
Just as a side note... Don't forget that many other dialplan
applications (Playback, Background, etc.) automatically answer the call
if it
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ever have problems with a call dropping after 30 seconds,
Answer() is usually the cause.
Thanks,
Steve T
This is the first I've heard of this. I've never actually had the drop
after
Steve Totaro wrote:
If you ever have problems with a call dropping after 30 seconds,
Answer() is usually the cause.
Answer is the /cause/? Or do you mean it's the solution?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
Answer() is seldom the solution.
Rob Hillis wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
If you ever have problems with a call dropping after 30 seconds,
Answer() is usually the cause.
Answer is the /cause/? Or do you mean it's the solution?
--
Consulting for Asterisk, Polycom, Sangoma, Digium,
20 matches
Mail list logo
