Remco Post wrote:
I guess that if I read these stats correctly, the bottleneck for * is
not so much cpu power, it's the cpu cache. As I see it, the cpu cache
becomes far less efficient for larger call volumes, eg. the cache is
unable to keep the most frequently used code and data in cache, due to
Matthew J. Roth wrote:
> List users,
>
> This post contains the benchmarks for Asterisk at high call volumes on a
> 4 CPU, dual-core (8 cores total) server. It's a continuation of the
> posts titled "Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at
> high call volumes". They contain a fair
List users,
This post contains the benchmarks for Asterisk at high call volumes on a
4 CPU, dual-core (8 cores total) server. It's a continuation of the
posts titled "Scaling Asterisk: Dual-Core CPUs not yielding gains at
high call volumes". They contain a fair amount of information,
includ
