You said there are 3 asterisk servers in your system. Are you using
ARA? Is it a multi-asterisk configuration?
Do you mean to tell the configuration of your environment?
On 7/12/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming a standard usage rate of 10-15%, that's 2,400 concurrent
For redundancy on the PRI side, we plug our PRIs into Redfone
Networks' foneBRIDGE boxes. They've worked quite well for us. As
others have stated, use short registration periods combined with some
HA software to handle your SIP redundancy. You might also look into
load-balancing SER proxies.
:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
Alejandro,
doesn't sound like you've read up or done research on ARA (Asterisk
Realtime Architecture)? That's what allows you to build asterisk
server clusters which draw upon configs either
:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
unplug, thanks for pointing that out as well as opposed to or in
complement with ARA where you can either implement DUNDi between
clusters of Asterisk servers or have a redundant pair of DUNDi lookup
Interesting points on both messages
1) as far as multiple asterisk servers talking to the same database is
concerned, I will have to test this out. I know nothing about the
database side of things, and a newbie on asterisk and linux so I have
no idea what and where the development of either of
I have asked about it here. As Douglas said, it doesn't support
mult-asterisk in current version.
However, I have questions about why multi-asterisk so difficult to implement.
1. As we can use ARA to store all information, sip user register info,
dial plan ... to DB. All asterisks can use ARA to
-Original Message-
From: RR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
Interesting points on both messages
1) as far as multiple asterisk servers
What about having the softphone/hardphones configured with a Main Asterisk
server and an Alternative Asterisk Server?.
I just did a couple of tests with a Cisco ATA 186 and worked quit well after
changing the RegInterval and Alternative Proxy Timeout.
thks,
Alejandro,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006
#1.. most the failures and network bottle necks on asterisk in a 1k + user sip /iax are registrations polling'syou are right .. get SER ... dont be dumb.#2 the config file with asterisk hardcode ips is a simple matter of running a script that parses it and puts in whatever it needs
#3 basic
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:34 -0400, Mike Lynchfield wrote:
#3b.. we need multiple listening addies.. since asterisk can only
listen to one ip its sucks for now
Incorrect.
Asterisk most definitely listens on multiple interfaces. We've got
several asterisk boxes that are multi-homed... one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:34 -0400, Mike Lynchfield wrote:
#3b.. we need multiple listening addies.. since asterisk can only
listen to one ip its sucks for now
That was case for asterisk 1.x
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:34 -0400, Mike Lynchfield wrote:
#3b.. we need multiple listening addies.. since asterisk can only
listen to one ip its sucks for now
Incorrect.
Asterisk most definitely listens on multiple interfaces. We've got
Message- From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:38 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:34 -0400, Mike Lynchfield wrote:
#3b.. we need multiple listening addies
, not on a subset of available addresses.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Asterisk realtime hardly provides redundancy.
Can do.
1. There's no support for realtime SIP where multiple Asterisk systems can
reference the same MySQL database for SIP peers. Ask Kevin Fleming about
this. It's known
call to handle in 16,000 users?
On 7/11/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: RR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/11/2006 7:23 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy
I feel interested about you can support 16,000 users of your system
Hi all,
I have read a lot about * server redundancy, however I still don't know
how to do it. Can any of you give me any advise?
For example, I've read about ranchnetworks appliances but don't know if it
will solve my problems.
As you may guess, I need to have two servers with the same
Alejandro,
doesn't sound like you've read up or done research on ARA (Asterisk
Realtime Architecture)? That's what allows you to build asterisk
server clusters which draw upon configs either for individual config
files OR entire family of processes froma common database (which can
then be made
I found a website talking about DUNDI witch asterisk clustering. What
is DUNDI actually? Does it can implement in asterisk
clustering/loadbalancing?
On 7/11/06, RR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alejandro,
doesn't sound like you've read up or done research on ARA (Asterisk
Realtime Architecture)?
unplug, thanks for pointing that out as well as opposed to or in
complement with ARA where you can either implement DUNDi between
clusters of Asterisk servers or have a redundant pair of DUNDi lookup
servers (just like DNS) somewhere remote to the local asterisk
servers. DUNDi is a p2p IAX based
21 matches
Mail list logo
