Thank you list for all the valuable input. Based on your input I have
decided to stay with 1.4 for now for the production systems.
Zeeshan A Zakaria
--
www.ilovetovoip.com
On 2010-08-24 2:13 PM, Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net
wrote:
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010,
On 10-08-24 09:59 AM, Gareth Blades wrote:
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
If you are planning to move then perhaps look at 1.6 to give you a
longer lifecycle with that release.
I wouldnt go with 1.8 as I dont believe it is out of beta yet or if it
is, it is only just and I wouldnt risk it in a
This info was useful. So now I have more than a year before I can think
about switching to a newer version.
Zeeshan A Zakaria
--
www.ilovetovoip.com
On 2010-08-25 12:34 PM, Leif Madsen leif.mad...@asteriskdocs.org wrote:
On 10-08-24 09:59 AM, Gareth Blades wrote:
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
If
Hi list,
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with it
to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my clients' 1.4 setups
have been rock solid and I don't want to put myself into any unnecessary
trouble. Those of you with solid experience with all these
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Hi list,
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with
it to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my clients' 1.4
setups have been rock solid and I don't want to put myself into any
unnecessary trouble. Those of you with
We moved a 1.4 installation to a VMWare environment some time ago and it was
fairly uneventful. Still, if it were me, I wouldn't change too many things at
once and I would first wait until what I currently run is stable under VM.
Once stable, I wouldn't hesitate to upgrade and that's one of
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Zeeshan
Zakaria
Subject: [asterisk-users] Should I move to 1.6 or 1.8, or stay with 1.4?
Hi list,
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with it
to move from
Did you use VMWare's hypervisor? I have no experience with it but I'll be
using Proxmox with no KVM, just OpenVZ because the server's processors don't
support hardware virtualization. I have worked for someone before with
Asterisk 1.4s running on Proxmox, and there was no issue regarding
We now run VMWare ESXi 4.0 on HP Proliant DL360 G5 and have not had any issues.
A couple of years ago, we tried OpenVZ, but did not have good results. Don't
ask to me explain what the problem was, because that was the problem...we
couldn't figure it out. It was just unexplained erratic
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Hi list,
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering
with it to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my
clients' 1.4 setups have been rock solid and I don't want to put
myself into any unnecessary trouble. Those of you with
Thanks for sharing your experience Bruce. I am going to use OpenVZ and hope
it'll work fine. Is ESXi free or costs license, just in case OpenVZ won't
work. The client I worked for, who was using OpenVZ had pretty moderately
busy asterisk servers and didn't have any issues with it.
Zeeshan A
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Hi list,
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with it
to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my clients' 1.4 setups
have been rock solid and I don't want to put myself into any unnecessary
trouble.
I'm not saying you will have issues with OpenVZ and Asterisk...just that we did
(a couple of years ago) and they went away when we rehosted on VMWare. It may
work fine for you.
We started out with the free version of VMWare, but soon thereafter upgraded
to a licensed version of VMWare
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Thanks for sharing your experience Bruce. I am going to use OpenVZ and hope
it'll work fine. Is ESXi free or costs license, just in case OpenVZ won't
work. The client I worked for, who was using OpenVZ had pretty moderately
busy asterisk servers and
Gorden, I agree with you and I moved to 1.4 only because I wanted to use the
'originate' command on asterisk CLI, and there was one more small little
feature difference which I don't remember now, but nothing more than that,
otherwise my 1.2 installation was just great. I know someone who didn't
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
I thought OpenVZ was 'depreciated'? That's sort of what I found when
looking at virtualisation at the start of the year. I'm using LXC and have
many servers running LXC with many containers inside just running
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
I thought OpenVZ was 'depreciated'? That's sort of what I found when
looking at virtualisation at the start of the year. I'm using LXC and have
many servers running
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:02:21PM +0100, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Thanks for sharing your experience Bruce. I am going to use OpenVZ and hope
it'll work fine. Is ESXi free or costs license, just in case OpenVZ won't
work. The client I worked
On Tuesday 24 Aug 2010, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with it
to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my clients' 1.4
setups have been rock solid and I don't want to put myself into any
unnecessary trouble. Those of you
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
I thought OpenVZ was 'depreciated'? That's sort of what I found
when looking at virtualisation at the start of the year. I'm
using LXC and
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
I thought OpenVZ was 'depreciated'? That's sort of what I found
when looking at
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
I thought OpenVZ was 'depreciated'? That's sort of what I found
22 matches
Mail list logo
