Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-10 Thread Steve Underwood
Klaus Darilion wrote: Steve Underwood schrieb: There seems to be a common misconception about 488. It represents an irrevocable failure of the call. Once a 488 is sent the call is essentially dead. A number of systems are able to continue beyond a 488, and allow further

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-10 Thread Peter Eisch
Klaus Darilion wrote: Steve Underwood schrieb: There seems to be a common misconception about 488. It represents an irrevocable failure of the call. Once a 488 is sent the call is essentially dead. A number of systems are able to continue beyond a 488, and allow further

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-09 Thread Klaus Darilion
Steve Underwood schrieb: Klaus Darilion wrote: Atis Lezdins schrieb: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38 Asterisk ATA w/o T.38

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-09 Thread Klaus Darilion
Benny Amorsen schrieb: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: Asterisk does not forward the 488 back to the caller, but hangs up the callee's call leg. Further, the caller's call leg will not be hung up. Is somebody aware of this problem and a fix? This should be fixed in

[asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38 Asterisk ATA w/o T.38 INVITE INVITE ---200OK-- ---200OK--

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Atis Lezdins
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38             Asterisk          ATA w/o T.38     INVITE                             INVITE                    

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Atis Lezdins schrieb: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38 Asterisk ATA w/o T.38 INVITE

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Atis Lezdins
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Atis Lezdins schrieb: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38             Asterisk          ATA

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Steve Underwood
Klaus Darilion wrote: Atis Lezdins schrieb: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Klaus Darilionklaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38 Asterisk ATA w/o T.38 INVITE

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-08 Thread Benny Amorsen
Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: Asterisk does not forward the 488 back to the caller, but hangs up the callee's call leg. Further, the caller's call leg will not be hung up. Is somebody aware of this problem and a fix? This should be fixed in 1.6.x. At least I had pretty